当代中国语境下能动司法的合理性研究

发布时间：2018-11-06 16:42

【摘要】：在积极应对国际金融危机,切实担负“保增长、保民生、保稳定”的重大司法使命的过程中,能动司法的意义得到了前所未有的凸显。通过司法实务界和法学理论界的不断探讨与总结,目前,我国能动司法的内涵、运行、方法和边界等重要问题逐步明确,一些基本共识在人民法院内部业已初步形成,这为探讨能动司法的深层次问题奠定了基础。但是,对能动司法为什么会在金融危机下的中国提出并为我国司法实务界普遍接受的问题却没有作出合理的解释。本文试图在理清能动司法基本内涵和相关概念的基础上,对能动司法在当代中国产生并发挥作用的必要性和可行性进行分析,以弥补能动司法理论上的欠缺,更好地指导能动司法在法院司法活动中的运用。本文的基本思路是：首先,根据现有文献对能动司法的内涵作一个阶段性总结,并对相关概念进行辨析；其次,从法律史、法哲学和现实需求等角度对能动司法的必要性进行分析；再次,从理论基础和现实基础两方面对能动司法的可行性进行论述；最后,强调能动司法的边界回归,防止盲目能动、过度能动,破坏司法权威,倡导一种温和的能动司法。
[Abstract]:In the process of actively responding to the international financial crisis and shouldering the important judicial mission of "ensuring growth, protecting people's livelihood and maintaining stability", the significance of active justice has been highlighted. Through the continuous discussion and summary of judicial practice and legal theory, at present, the connotation, operation, method and boundary of active judicature in our country are gradually clarified, and some basic consensus has been preliminarily formed within the people's court. This has laid the foundation for exploring the deep level question of active judicature. However, there is no reasonable explanation for why the active judicature was put forward in China under the financial crisis and generally accepted by the judicial practice of our country. This paper attempts to analyze the necessity and feasibility of active justice in contemporary China on the basis of clarifying the basic connotation and related concepts of active justice, in order to make up for the lack of active judicial theory. Better guide the use of active justice in court judicial activities. The basic ideas of this paper are as follows: first, according to the existing literature to make a stage summary of the connotation of active justice, and to discriminate and analyze the relevant concepts; Secondly, it analyzes the necessity of active justice from the angles of legal history, philosophy of law and practical needs, and discusses the feasibility of active justice from two aspects: theoretical basis and practical basis. Finally, it emphasizes the boundary return of active justice, prevents blind initiative, excessive initiative, undermines judicial authority, and advocates a kind of moderate active justice.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】