审判实践中的民意考量与公正追求
[Abstract]:In trial practice, how to effectively consider public opinion, avoid blind eyes caused by ignoring public opinion, avoid judicial isolation and pride, aloofness, apathy, and avoid the phenomenon that the judiciary is influenced by public opinion and public opinion, and recoils in front of politics, Cultivating people's belief in the rule of law is something every legal person must face. This paper attempts to complete the writing of the public opinion in trial practice from four aspects: the concept, the constitution, the influence on the trial, the necessity of considering the public opinion, the principle of considering the public opinion, and the mechanism of considering the public opinion. At the beginning of this paper, the author makes a detailed analysis of public opinion, which is divided into three angles: the main body of expressing public opinion, the way of expressing public opinion and the platform of expressing public opinion. In addition, it classifies public opinion from the angle of whether it promotes the process of rule of law, whether it is reasonable or not, whether it is true or not, and examines the influence of public opinion on the administration of justice. This influence is divided into two aspects: related historical investigation and our country's investigation of public opinion in recent decades. These studies are mainly to clarify the ideas of public opinion, can have a relatively clear understanding of public opinion. The second part of this article is mainly about the relationship between the consideration of public opinion and justice. From a theoretical point of view, if we want to pursue judicial justice, we should reject public opinion itself, but specifically to the current situation of our country's trials. The proper consideration of public opinion is to pursue judicial justice, and the consideration of public opinion and the pursuit of justice is a relationship between cause and effect, or the pursuit of justice is the guiding ideology of considering public opinion. The consideration of public opinion is not the temporary submission of public opinion, but in order to really understand the aspirations of the public, to integrate justice into the public, to achieve harmonious justice, sunshine justice. In trial practice, we should not only consider public opinion, but also put public opinion under the yoke. Only in this way can we not only listen to public opinion, but also safeguard the basic dignity of the law and judicial justice in a realistic sense, and at the same time, we can not be isolated from society. We are not disconnected from society and are not burdened by public opinion. The principle of considering public opinion according to law emphasizes that when facing public opinion, judges should not be influenced by public opinion, put public opinion within the scope of law and consider according to legal procedure. Strict the principle of public opinion scope, pay attention to the consideration of public opinion cases are limited to the greater discretion of the case, this is the law of stability and predictability, to maintain a high degree of openness principle, is the sunshine of justice, the inevitable requirements of justice; Public opinion should follow the principle of initiative, emphasize the subjective initiative of judicature, and satisfy the public's demand for justice. Under the guidance of the above four principles, the public opinion consideration and the pursuit of justice can be achieved through seeking the working mechanism of public opinion evaluation. First of all, the formation mechanism of public opinion should be constructed. The premise of the formation mechanism is that the public opinion has sufficient tolerance to the judiciary, and the necessary condition is that the legal community and scholars have sufficient support for the judiciary. Secondly, to establish a variety of ways to consider public opinion. Most of the existing platforms for the consideration of public opinion are based on the consideration of public opinion on the Internet. Internet public opinion has its own advantages, but it also has great shortcomings. Therefore, it is necessary to build a variety of platforms to consider public opinion. Public opinion measures are divided into specific responses and general responses. The system of judicial consideration of public opinion also includes two kinds, such as paying attention to the system of people's jury in the course of trial; in the content of judgment, strengthening the reasoning of the judgment book and persuading the parties from the angle of the judge.
【学位授予单位】:昆明理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D926
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 甄芒;;老河口“民意罢官”风波[J];民主与法制;2004年23期
2 孙笑侠,熊静波;判决与民意——兼比较考察中美法官如何对待民意[J];政法论坛;2005年05期
3 谢望原;关于死刑存废的断想[J];郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年05期
4 范晓军;;民进党急速衰敝的政治发展脉络——岛内“二次政党轮替”的民意逐渐浮现[J];台湾研究集刊;2006年02期
5 张超;;民意漩涡中的司法悖论及其解决[J];吉林广播电视大学学报;2006年05期
6 张超;;民意与司法——司法改革的一种法理学透视[J];江苏广播电视大学学报;2007年01期
7 曾兰清;;个案与我国的法治进程[J];法制与社会;2007年04期
8 陶文昭;;正确对待网络民意[J];红旗文稿;2007年11期
9 ;读者[J];新西部;2007年12期
10 黄海涛;;ATM案,为何民意向左法律向右[J];大江周刊(城市生活);2008年05期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 汪永成;李宣;;城市社区基层民意机制的探索性创新——对盐田区民意畅达模式的研究[A];地方政府发展研究(第七辑2011)[C];2012年
2 芦桂英;张萍;;探析仲裁实务中出现的问题[A];第三届西部律师发展论坛论文集[C];2010年
3 简用超;;反映民意、凝聚民心是政协工作实践“三个代表”的必然要求[A];弘扬延安精神实践“三个代表”[C];2002年
4 王丽萍;;察民心 知民意 加快推进社会建设——山东省城市居民社会信心情况调查研究[A];中国特色社会主义:理论·道路·事业——山东省社会科学界2008年学术年会文集(4)[C];2008年
5 傅贤国;;司法裁判吸纳民意机制之建构[A];当代法学论坛(二○○九年第3辑)[C];2009年
6 王文俊;刘荣新;;政府科学决策中的民意参与之道——对《广州市政府重大决策程序规定》的若干建议[A];中国社会学会2010年年会——“社会稳定与社会管理机制研究”论坛论文集[C];2010年
7 汪永成;李宣;;城市社区基层民意机制的探索性创新——对盐田区民意畅达模式的研究[A];2011广东社会科学学术年会——地方政府职能与社会公共管理论文集[C];2011年
8 王新环;;检察权独立行使的制度保障[A];首届国家高级检察官论坛论文集[C];2005年
9 孔璋;;一体与独立之争论及检察一体制论证[A];第二届国家高级检察官论坛论文集[C];2006年
10 朱淑娣;;WTO法与中国贸易救济审查制度关联的视角[A];《WTO法与中国论坛》文集——中国法学会世界贸易组织法研究会年会论文集(八)[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 记者 田九星 通讯员 任国栋;忻府区在全省法院率先开通民意专用电子信箱[N];山西日报;2009年
2 周科;切实加强对“网络民意”的管理与引导[N];青岛日报;2009年
3 本报记者 赵文明;“网络民意”写进湖南政府工作报告[N];法制日报;2010年
4 通讯员 张成亮 徐峰;泌阳县“民意热线”热心为民[N];驻马店日报;2010年
5 江西南昌 安敬元;不该扭曲的民意[N];人民日报;2010年
6 本报记者 张佳;民意之声经久回荡[N];团结报;2010年
7 本报记者 白炜;网络热词:民意与传播[N];中国文化报;2010年
8 记者 王洁 通讯员 吴平平;科学履职察民意解民忧[N];长沙晚报;2010年
9 本报评论员 易艳刚;“征”而不“听”,请别糟践了“民意”[N];新华每日电讯;2010年
10 新华社记者 舒静 金小茜;让“民意”多飞一会儿没什么坏处[N];新华每日电讯;2010年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 陈莹莹;刑事检察监督的程序化研究[D];复旦大学;2011年
2 刘小妹;中国近代宪政理论的特质研究[D];中国政法大学;2007年
3 唐小兵;现代中国的公共舆论[D];华东师范大学;2009年
4 严仁群;民事执行权论[D];南京师范大学;2005年
5 梁s,
本文编号:2410843
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2410843.html