当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

论我国检察机关侦查活动监督的缺陷和完善

发布时间:2019-02-08 17:08
【摘要】:刑事侦查活动作为刑事诉讼的一个准备阶段,在整个刑事诉讼过程中占有着重要的地位,是侦破案件、收集犯罪证据并据以证实犯罪的重要过程,并与其后的起诉、审判相衔接形成一个完整的刑事诉讼过程。正是侦查活动所承担的这一重要任务,使得侦查机关或部门与犯罪嫌疑人的对抗最为激烈,而为了侦破案件、证明犯罪,维护刑法所保护的法益和社会秩序,往往赋予侦查机关或部门以强大的侦查权,这一方面为收集证据、查明犯罪事实提供了保障,另一方面也在事实上拉大了侦查机关或部门与犯罪嫌疑人的实力对比,使得犯罪嫌疑人的合法权益极易受到侦查权的不当侵害。我国宪法规定人民检察院是国家的法律监督机关,对于公安、国安等侦查机关及检察院内部的自侦部门的侦查活动负有监督职权。但由于我国目前的刑事诉讼模式重配合而轻监督以及立法方面的欠缺,致使检察机关的侦查监督权不能得到充分地发挥。基于此,应不断加强检察机关的侦查监督权,通过赋予检察机关对于侦查活动启动与终止的决定权、加强对强制措施的审查权以及完善侦查监督等手段,使检察机关的侦查监督职能得以充分发挥。其次应硬化侦查监督的措施,赋予检察机关以侦查权、明确检察机关在侦查监督中的制裁权、明确检察机关引导侦查的权力、切实做好非法证据排除工作,使得侦查监督的效力得以强化。再次还应扩大检察机关侦查监督的范围,将所有强制措施的适用纳入到侦查监督的范围内,归案撤回提捕制度以及监督侦查机关法律适用问题,使得侦查活动全部纳入法律监督的范围之内。最后还应加强对自侦案件的监督力度,将自侦案件与普通刑事案件的侦查置于同等的监督之下。
[Abstract]:As a preparatory stage of criminal proceedings, criminal investigation plays an important role in the whole process of criminal proceedings. It is an important process of detecting cases, collecting criminal evidence and proving the crime. The trial converges to form a complete criminal procedure. It is precisely this important task of investigation activities that makes the confrontation between the investigative organs or departments and criminal suspects most intense. In order to detect cases, prove crimes and maintain the legal interests and social order protected by the criminal law, The investigative organs or departments are often given powerful investigative powers. On the one hand, this provides protection for collecting evidence and finding out the facts of crimes, on the other hand, it also increases the strength of the investigative organs or departments with criminal suspects. The legitimate rights and interests of criminal suspects are vulnerable to improper infringement of investigation power. The Constitution of our country stipulates that the people's Procuratorate is the legal supervisory organ of the state, and it has the supervisory authority over the investigation activities of the investigation organs such as the public security, the national security and the procuratorate. However, due to the lack of supervision and legislation, the procuratorial organ's power of investigation and supervision can not be brought into full play. In view of this, we should constantly strengthen the procuratorial organs' power of supervision in investigation, strengthen the power of examination of coercive measures and improve the supervision of investigation by endowing the procuratorial organs with the right to decide on the initiation and termination of investigative activities, and so on. The investigation and supervision functions of procuratorial organs can be brought into full play. Secondly, we should harden the measures of investigation supervision, endow the procuratorial organ with the investigation power, clarify the sanction power of the procuratorial organ in the investigation supervision, clarify the power of the procuratorial organ to guide the investigation, and effectively do the work of excluding the illegal evidence. So that the effectiveness of investigation and supervision can be strengthened. Thirdly, we should also expand the scope of investigation and supervision of procuratorial organs, incorporate the application of all coercive measures into the scope of investigation supervision, bring back the system of arrest and arrest, and supervise the legal application of investigative organs. So that all investigation activities into the scope of legal supervision. Finally, we should strengthen the supervision of self-detection cases and put them under the same supervision as ordinary criminal cases.
【学位授予单位】:河北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D926.34;D925.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 李梁钰;;我国侦查监督现状分析及完善[J];法制与经济(下旬刊);2009年04期

2 张伟;;刑事侦查的监督与司法控制[J];法制与社会;2009年06期

3 邓训民;;刑讯逼供产生的原因以及防治对策思考[J];法制与社会;2009年30期

4 姚子泉;;浅议“无罪推定”原则[J];法制与社会;2010年12期

5 张丽华;;浅议“检察引导侦查”机制运行的司法效应[J];法制与社会;2010年18期

6 郭嗣彦;许娟;;检察引导侦查的价值评价[J];甘肃社会科学;2008年03期

7 天津市北辰区人民检察院课题组;王援东;;刑事诉讼监督机制的完善与创新[J];河北法学;2010年03期

8 陈玲;;论我国非法证据排除规则[J];哈尔滨学院学报;2010年03期

9 宋蕾;王媛媛;;检察实践视角下附条件逮捕制度分析与展望[J];中国检察官;2009年09期

10 ;浅谈人民监督员制度外部化的问题[J];今日科苑;2010年06期



本文编号:2418596

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2418596.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户9f315***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com