检察机关正名制度研究
发布时间：2019-02-11 12:23
【摘要】：检察机关正名制度,是指检察机关经调查后,查清被举报人无犯罪事实,属误告、错告或者诬告的,对被举报人,就误告、错告或诬告的内容在一定范围内澄清事实、消除影响的制度。如果说举报人保护制度是检察举报制度的重点,那检察机关正名制度则是硬币的另一面,是具有中国特色检察举报制度中不可或缺的重要组成部分。检察机关正名制度是伴随我国检察举报制度的发展和完善而出现的一种新鲜事物,虽然目前学界对检察机关正名制度关注不多,但其出现对于保护受到不实举报的公民的合法权益意义重大,具有进一步推广的价值。本文综合运用分析、比较和实证等研究方法,对检察机关正名制度进行了详细的理论分析和梳理,除引言和结论及展望部分外,文章分为以下四个部分： 第一部分是检察机关正名制度的简介。由于少有文章论及,较多人对正名制度相当陌生,所以本部分着重介绍了正名制度的由来、内涵界定等内容,并用较大篇幅论述了检察正名制度的实践和理论基础,让大家对检察机关正名制度有一个大体轮廓上的了解。 第二部分介绍了我国检察机关正名制度的发展现状和存在的问题。由于种种原因,正名制度一出现,便遇到了较多的质疑和反对声音。对此,如何理性看待,并从中提炼出合理成分,裨益于正名制度在实践中的不断完善,是作者对之进行深入研究、探讨和归纳的初衷。 第三部分着墨于检察机关全面推行正名制度的意义。本来此内容完全可以作为第二部分的一个小节进行论述,但由于各界对正名制度的价值和存在必要性一直都存有争议,甚至认为由检察官出面来为公务员正名,是典型的现代版“官官相护”,以致正名制度有被污名化之虞,故笔者努力尝试从多角度为正名制度进行积极的呐喊和“正名”。 第四部分是如何进一步完善我国的检察机关正名制度。笔者从侧重实务入手,详细阐述了正名制度的立法路径,检察机关正名制度的主要原则、适用条件、审核批准程序、正名方式等内容,并对正名的排除适用条件进行了分析,希冀藉此为检察机关正名制度的进一步完善献出自己的绵力。
[Abstract]:The system of correcting the name of the procuratorial organ means that the procuratorial organ, after investigation, ascertains the fact that the informant is not guilty, is a false accusation, or falsely accuses him, and clarifies the facts within a certain scope on the contents of the false accusation or false accusation of the informer, A system for eliminating influence. If the whistleblower protection system is the focus of the procuratorial reporting system, then the procuratorial system is the other side of the coin, which is an indispensable part of the procuratorial reporting system with Chinese characteristics. The system of correcting the name of the procuratorial organ is a new thing that appears along with the development and perfection of the procuratorial reporting system in our country, although the academic circles pay little attention to the system of correcting the name of the procuratorial organ at present. However, its appearance is of great significance to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the citizens who have been untruthfully reported, and has the value of further promotion. This paper makes a detailed theoretical analysis and combing of the system of correcting the name of procuratorial organs by means of analysis, comparison and demonstration, except for the foreword, conclusion and prospect. The article is divided into the following four parts: the first part is a brief introduction of the system of procuratorial organs. As few articles have been discussed and many people are quite unfamiliar with the system of correcting names, this part mainly introduces the origin, connotation and definition of the system, and discusses the practice and theoretical basis of the system of procuratorial correction of names. Let everybody to procuratorial organ correct name system has a general outline on the understanding. The second part introduces the current situation and existing problems of the system of procuratorial organs. For a variety of reasons, the emergence of the system, they met more doubts and objections. Therefore, how to treat it rationally and extract reasonable elements from it is the original intention for the author to deeply study, explore and induce the system of correct name in practice. The third part deals with the significance of carrying out the system of correction of name in the procuratorial organs in an all-round way. Originally, this content could have been discussed as a subsection of the second part. However, as all circles have always disputed the value and necessity of the system of rectification of names, they even thought that the public prosecutor should come forward to correct the name of civil servants. It is a typical modern version of "officials protect each other", so the system of correct name is in danger of being stigmatized, so the author tries hard to make a positive cry and "correct name" for the system from many angles. The fourth part is how to improve the system of procuratorial organs. Starting with the practice, the author expounds in detail the legislative path of the system, the main principles of the system, the conditions of application, the procedure of examination and approval, the method of correcting the name, and so on, and analyzes the applicable conditions for the exclusion of the correct name. I hope to use this to further improve the system of procuratorial organs to give their own strength.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926.3
本文编号：2419730
[Abstract]:The system of correcting the name of the procuratorial organ means that the procuratorial organ, after investigation, ascertains the fact that the informant is not guilty, is a false accusation, or falsely accuses him, and clarifies the facts within a certain scope on the contents of the false accusation or false accusation of the informer, A system for eliminating influence. If the whistleblower protection system is the focus of the procuratorial reporting system, then the procuratorial system is the other side of the coin, which is an indispensable part of the procuratorial reporting system with Chinese characteristics. The system of correcting the name of the procuratorial organ is a new thing that appears along with the development and perfection of the procuratorial reporting system in our country, although the academic circles pay little attention to the system of correcting the name of the procuratorial organ at present. However, its appearance is of great significance to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the citizens who have been untruthfully reported, and has the value of further promotion. This paper makes a detailed theoretical analysis and combing of the system of correcting the name of procuratorial organs by means of analysis, comparison and demonstration, except for the foreword, conclusion and prospect. The article is divided into the following four parts: the first part is a brief introduction of the system of procuratorial organs. As few articles have been discussed and many people are quite unfamiliar with the system of correcting names, this part mainly introduces the origin, connotation and definition of the system, and discusses the practice and theoretical basis of the system of procuratorial correction of names. Let everybody to procuratorial organ correct name system has a general outline on the understanding. The second part introduces the current situation and existing problems of the system of procuratorial organs. For a variety of reasons, the emergence of the system, they met more doubts and objections. Therefore, how to treat it rationally and extract reasonable elements from it is the original intention for the author to deeply study, explore and induce the system of correct name in practice. The third part deals with the significance of carrying out the system of correction of name in the procuratorial organs in an all-round way. Originally, this content could have been discussed as a subsection of the second part. However, as all circles have always disputed the value and necessity of the system of rectification of names, they even thought that the public prosecutor should come forward to correct the name of civil servants. It is a typical modern version of "officials protect each other", so the system of correct name is in danger of being stigmatized, so the author tries hard to make a positive cry and "correct name" for the system from many angles. The fourth part is how to improve the system of procuratorial organs. Starting with the practice, the author expounds in detail the legislative path of the system, the main principles of the system, the conditions of application, the procedure of examination and approval, the method of correcting the name, and so on, and analyzes the applicable conditions for the exclusion of the correct name. I hope to use this to further improve the system of procuratorial organs to give their own strength.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 薛国君;李志刚;;农村基层组织成员职务犯罪的法律适用问题[J];当代法学;2011年01期
2 王义尧;宁玲玲;;检察机关为被错告诬告者正名制度的构建[J];重庆理工大学学报(社会科学);2012年09期
3 李建明;;署名举报人对检察机关不立案决定的监督[J];人民检察;2008年07期
4 单民;上官春光;;职务犯罪案件举报风险与制度控制[J];人民检察;2010年18期
5 冯铁金;古代的举报制度[J];政府法制;2003年20期
6 焦洪昌;"国家尊重和保障人权"的宪法分析[J];中国法学;2004年03期
7 王雅琴;;论公民检举权——政治参与的视角[J];中共青岛市委党校.青岛行政学院学报;2009年11期
8 杨建顺;;行政法视野中的社会管理创新[J];中国人民大学学报;2011年01期
9 房栋;关于实行“正名制度”的思考[J];政治与法律;2000年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 王伟;论我国举报人合法权益保护制度的完善[D];中国政法大学;2011年
2 朱爱萍;论公职人员名誉权的限制[D];华东政法大学;2011年
3 彭启昌;检察举报制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2011年
4 吴楠;公民举报权的法律保障机制及其完善[D];安徽大学;2006年
5 程思;我国检察举报制度的改革路径探析[D];湖南大学;2008年
，本文编号：2419730
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2419730.html
