论我国非诉调解协议司法确认程序的构建
发布时间：2019-05-21 22:26
【摘要】：司法确认程序的探索和改革是我国近几年来的热点问题，理论界和实务界也在探索能否在《民事诉讼法》修订中增设关于司法确认程序的内容。司法确认程序作为“司法先行，立法滞后”的正处于探索阶段的新兴事物，合法性的缺失和程序运行规则的阙如，成为制约司法确认程序运行和发展的关键性因素。本文尝试在《民事诉讼法》中构建完备的司法确认程序，，将其适用范围扩大到人民调解协议之外的特定非诉调解协议，全文共四章，紧紧围绕着非诉调解协议司法确认程序的立法构建这一主题展开： 第一章是对司法确认程序的基本理论研究。主要论述非诉调解协议司法确认程序的概念、性质和构建该程序的意义，以及通过与外国ADR程序进行比较凸显出我国司法确认程序的优点。 第二章是对我国司法确认程序的现状考察。首先是针对司法确认程序的立法现状，分析其立法的背景、进程以及存在的缺陷；其次是对当前各地法院关于司法确认程序的实践现状分析，以期为后面的构建提供现实依据。 第三章、第四章是对司法确认程序立法构建的具体建议。第三章将构建司法确认程序的相关重点理论问题提出来先行重点探讨。第四章则是按照程序运行的逻辑顺序，从司法确认程序的启动、审查、决定、执行以及配套措施各环节去系统地探讨如何进行立法构建。
[Abstract]:The exploration and reform of judicial confirmation procedure is a hot issue in our country in recent years. The theoretical and practical circles are also exploring whether the contents of judicial confirmation procedure can be added to the revision of Civil procedure Law. As a new thing in the exploratory stage, the judicial confirmation procedure is in the exploratory stage. The lack of legitimacy and the lack of procedural operation rules have become the key factors restricting the operation and development of the judicial confirmation procedure. This paper attempts to construct a complete judicial confirmation procedure in the Civil procedure Law and extend its scope of application to the specific non-litigation mediation agreement other than the people's mediation agreement. It closely revolves around the theme of the legislative construction of the judicial confirmation procedure of the non-litigation mediation agreement: the first chapter is the basic theoretical study of the judicial confirmation procedure. This paper mainly discusses the concept, nature and significance of the judicial confirmation procedure of non-litigation mediation agreement, and highlights the advantages of the judicial confirmation procedure of our country by comparing with the foreign ADR program. The second chapter is the investigation of the current situation of judicial confirmation procedure in our country. First of all, in view of the legislative status of the judicial confirmation procedure, this paper analyzes the background, process and defects of the legislation; secondly, it analyzes the current situation of the practice of the judicial confirmation procedure in various courts, in order to provide a realistic basis for the construction of the following. The third chapter, the fourth chapter is the concrete suggestion to the judicial confirmation procedure legislation construction. The third chapter puts forward the key theoretical issues related to the construction of judicial confirmation procedure. The fourth chapter is to systematically explore how to construct the legislation from the start, review, decision, implementation and supporting measures of the judicial confirmation procedure according to the logical order of the procedure operation.
【学位授予单位】：广东商学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926
本文编号：2482452
[Abstract]:The exploration and reform of judicial confirmation procedure is a hot issue in our country in recent years. The theoretical and practical circles are also exploring whether the contents of judicial confirmation procedure can be added to the revision of Civil procedure Law. As a new thing in the exploratory stage, the judicial confirmation procedure is in the exploratory stage. The lack of legitimacy and the lack of procedural operation rules have become the key factors restricting the operation and development of the judicial confirmation procedure. This paper attempts to construct a complete judicial confirmation procedure in the Civil procedure Law and extend its scope of application to the specific non-litigation mediation agreement other than the people's mediation agreement. It closely revolves around the theme of the legislative construction of the judicial confirmation procedure of the non-litigation mediation agreement: the first chapter is the basic theoretical study of the judicial confirmation procedure. This paper mainly discusses the concept, nature and significance of the judicial confirmation procedure of non-litigation mediation agreement, and highlights the advantages of the judicial confirmation procedure of our country by comparing with the foreign ADR program. The second chapter is the investigation of the current situation of judicial confirmation procedure in our country. First of all, in view of the legislative status of the judicial confirmation procedure, this paper analyzes the background, process and defects of the legislation; secondly, it analyzes the current situation of the practice of the judicial confirmation procedure in various courts, in order to provide a realistic basis for the construction of the following. The third chapter, the fourth chapter is the concrete suggestion to the judicial confirmation procedure legislation construction. The third chapter puts forward the key theoretical issues related to the construction of judicial confirmation procedure. The fourth chapter is to systematically explore how to construct the legislation from the start, review, decision, implementation and supporting measures of the judicial confirmation procedure according to the logical order of the procedure operation.
【学位授予单位】：广东商学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 王琳;论调解协议司法确认程序[D];华东政法大学;2013年
2 张欠欠;担保物权实现程序研究[D];河南大学;2014年
3 纪振华;论调解协议司法确认制度[D];中南大学;2014年
本文编号：2482452
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2482452.html
