公司归入权制度研究

发布时间：2018-01-18 08:45

本文关键词：公司归入权制度研究　出处：《中国政法大学》2008年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 我国2005年修改后的《公司法》和《证券法》均规定了在特定情况下公司享有归入权,即公司可以将特定主体(董事、监事、高级管理人员及大股东)从事特定行为(违反忠实义务的行为和短线交易)所获收益收归公司所有。但是我国的立法规定相对来说过于简单,对公司归入权行使的主体、对象、条件、程序和期限等都没有具体而明确的规定。立法上的诸多缺失就导致该项制度在实务操作上面临了诸多的困难,同时也造成了司法实践在运用相关规定时的不便。因此,有必要对公司归入权以及围绕公司归入权建立的相关制度体系加以设计和重构。本文遵循了“制度概述——制度价值——制度架构——我国立法及其实践分析”的思路,在借鉴美国、英国、日本、台湾地区等立法规定的基础上,具体分析了公司归入权制度。本文主要运用了历史考察的方法、比较的方法、价值分析的方法等,全文分为五个章节,包括:公司归入权制度概述(侧重介绍公司归入权的概念,界定该权利的性质)、公司归入权制度的理论基础和制度价值(从制度和法理角度探寻公司归入权的理论基础,并指出其制度价值就在于维护公司财产权益)、公司归入权制度之基本架构(从主体、适用法律事实等各个方面剖析公司归入权制度)、公司归入权适用中的辅助制度(介绍了信息披露、股东代位诉讼和利益计算等问题)、我国公司归入权制度之检视与完善。相较于其他研究成果而言,笔者将研究重点放在两个方面:其一是公司归入权制度的价值所在,其二是该项制度的体系构建。针对我国立法现状,本文指出了我国立法在规范对象、行使主体、适用法律事实、权利期间、行使方式等方面的不足,建议我国在完善相关立法规定的基础上,引入“股东代位诉讼”、“信息披露”等制度,切实保障公司归入权的实现。
[Abstract]:In 2005, the Company Law and the Securities Law both stipulated that the company has the right of subsumption under certain circumstances, that is, the company can take the specific subject (director, supervisor). Senior managers and major shareholders) who engage in specific acts (violations of obligations of loyalty and short-term transactions) proceeds to the company. But the legislative provisions of our country is relatively simple. The main body, object, condition, procedure and time limit of the exercise of the company's right of ascription are not specific and clear. The lack of legislation leads to many difficulties in the practical operation of the system. At the same time, it also causes the inconvenience of judicial practice in the application of relevant provisions. Therefore, it is necessary to design and reconstruct the corporate taxing right and the related system around it. This article follows the idea of "system overview-institutional value-institutional framework-legislation and its practice analysis of our country", on the basis of drawing lessons from the United States, Britain, Japan, Taiwan and other legislative provisions. This paper mainly uses the method of historical investigation, the method of comparison, the method of value analysis and so on. The full text is divided into five chapters. Including: an overview of the system of corporate subsumption (focusing on the introduction of the concept of corporate ascription to the right to define the nature of the right). The theoretical basis and institutional value of corporate ascription system (from the perspective of institution and legal theory to explore the theoretical basis of corporate ascription right and point out that its institutional value lies in safeguarding the property rights and interests of the company). The basic framework of the system of corporate ascription (from the subject, applicable legal facts and other aspects) analyzes the system of corporate ascription, the auxiliary system in the application of the right of corporate ascription (introduces the information disclosure). The problems of shareholder subrogation and interest calculation are reviewed and perfected in China's corporate taxing system. Compared with other research results. The author focuses on two aspects: one is the value of the system of corporate ascription, the other is the system construction of the system. In view of the current situation of legislation in China, this paper points out that the legislation of our country is regulating the object. To exercise the main body, apply the legal facts, rights during the exercise of the lack of ways and other aspects of the proposed legislation in China on the basis of improving the relevant provisions of the introduction of "shareholder subrogation litigation", "information disclosure" and other systems. To ensure the realization of the company's right to relegate.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【引证文献】