浅析我国股东代表诉讼制度的完善

发布时间：2018-02-26 10:30

本文关键词： 股东代表诉讼股东起诉资格诉讼担保前置制度激励机制　出处：《西南政法大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：2003年“上市公司新都酒店案”是我国在司法上对股东代表诉讼的一种尝试。2006年《公司法》修订后确立了股东代表诉讼制度。2009年12月“小股东诉三联集团侵犯*ST三联权益案”被山东省高级人民法院获准立案。作为我国《公司法》修订后首例股东代表诉讼案,它具有重要的实践意义。可是从法院立案到现在,案件审理比较缓慢。股东代表诉讼制度的立法还是比较原则、人们对其认识还有诸多不清楚之处是其重要原因之一。因此,很有必要对我国股东代表诉讼进行研究。本文将分为四部分进行论述。第一部分；我国股东代表诉讼制度概述。这一部分里介绍了我国股东代表诉讼定义、股东代表诉讼与股东直接诉讼的比较；阐述了股东代表诉讼的制度价值：对公司治理的改善；保护中小股东的利益。第二部分；股东代表诉讼的产生、发展与境外立法之比较。这部分介绍股东代表诉讼的产生、发展和股东代表诉讼制度在境外比较。其中重点介绍境外股东代表诉讼制度中的起诉股东资格；股东代表诉讼的被告；公司的诉讼法律地位；前置程序；诉讼担保；诉讼费用及负担；诉讼和解；诉讼管辖权。第三部分；我国股东代表诉讼制度发展状况评析。这一部分,介绍了我国股东代表诉讼制度在立法、司法上的演进,并对当前股东代表诉讼发展困境的原因予以分析：在立法方面,对股东起诉资格没有明确规定；被告范围太窄；前置制度不完善；公司诉讼地位不清楚；诉讼管辖权不明确等等。在司法方面有无司法解释,理解不一致等原因。在股东个人方面有缺乏激励机制等因素。第四部分；我国股东代表诉讼制度的完善对策。这一部分从以下个方面论述：要明确股东起诉资格：笔者认为股东资格应由单独股东权和少数股东权相结合。对被告范围的确定：笔者认为被告范围宜为扩大。对于公司在诉讼中的地位；笔者认为把公司作为无独立请求权的第三人为宜。我国《公司法》应明确我国股东代表诉讼的前置制度和代表诉讼担保问题。论文对诉讼受理费、明确诉讼和解、诉讼管辖权问题和股东个人代表诉讼激励机制方面进行了论述。
[Abstract]:2003 Xindu Hotel case of listed Company is an attempt of judicial action against shareholder's representative in our country. After the revision of the Company Law of 2006, the system of shareholder's Representative Action was established. On December 2009, "small shareholder v. Sanlian Group infringed St III" The joint rights and interests case was approved by the Shandong Provincial higher people's Court to file the case. As the first shareholder representative lawsuit after the amendment of the Company Law of China, It has important practical significance. However, since the case was filed in court until now, the trial of cases is relatively slow. The legislation of shareholder's representative litigation system is still a comparative principle, and people still have a lot of unclear understanding of it is one of the important reasons. It is necessary to study the shareholder representative litigation in China. This article will be divided into four parts to discuss. In this part, the author introduces the definition of shareholder's representative action, the comparison between shareholder's representative action and shareholder's direct action. This paper expounds the institutional value of shareholder representative litigation: improving corporate governance and protecting the interests of minority shareholders. The second part: the generation and development of shareholder representative litigation and the comparison with foreign legislation. This part introduces the generation of shareholder representative litigation. Development and comparison of shareholder Representative Litigation system abroad. The emphasis is on the qualification of suing shareholders; the defendant of shareholder Representative Action; the legal status of the company; the leading procedure; Litigation guarantee; Litigation costs and burden; litigation settlement; litigation jurisdiction. Part three: analysis of the development of shareholder representative litigation system in China. This part introduces the legislative and judicial evolution of shareholder representative litigation system in China. The reasons for the difficulties in the development of shareholder representative litigation are analyzed: in legislation, there is no clear stipulation on shareholders' qualification to sue; the scope of defendant is too narrow; the front system is not perfect; the position of company litigation is not clear; Legal jurisdiction is not clear and so on. There is no judicial interpretation in the judicial aspect, the reasons such as inconsistency of understanding, lack of incentive mechanism in the individual aspect of shareholders and so on. Part 4th; The author thinks that shareholder's qualification should be combined with individual shareholder's right and minority shareholder's right. The author thinks that the scope of the defendant should be expanded. The author thinks that it is appropriate to regard the company as the third party without independent claim. The Company Law of our country should make clear the pre-system of shareholder representative action and the guarantee of representative litigation in our country. The issue of litigation jurisdiction and the incentive mechanism of shareholder's personal representative litigation are discussed.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】