瑕疵出资股权转让法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-03 18:13

本文选题：瑕疵出资　切入点：股权转让　出处：《大连海事大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：实现股权转让的前提是股东通过向目标公司出资的方式而获得股权。2006年施行的新《公司法》允许股东分期缴纳出资,并且鼓励非货币出资的多样性,这有利于促进经济的健康发展,但是我国目前整个社会的诚信体系建设相对滞后,这在客观上加剧了股东出资瑕疵的风险。瑕疵出资导致瑕疵股权的存在,瑕疵股权在转让的过程中发生的问题层出不穷,这一现象严重冲击着我国社会经济的稳定与和谐。《最高人民法院关于适用中华人民共和国公司法若干问题的规定(三)》[’]的出台填补了以往我国商事法律和司法解释对于瑕疵股权转让问题规定上的一些空白,但是对于瑕疵股权转让合同的效力仍然没有做出明确的认定；在瑕疵股权转让后相关责任的承担上,也还有一些需要完善之处。笔者通过对理论观点与实践做法的梳理和系统分析,综合考虑社会经济秩序、经济交易安全、经济交易效率、社会公平公正等法律价值目标,采用归纳分析及演绎推理,以及实证研究的方法,提出一些自己的见解,期待对这些问题的解决提供有益的帮助。全文分为引言、正文、和结语三个部分：引言简述了文章写作的目的和意义,对研究范围所存在的限制进行了一定的说明,并指出了文章主要内容。正文第一部分对瑕疵股权进行了理论分析。这部分首先对瑕疵股权的概念进行了界定。其次将瑕疵出资股权常见的分类进行了归纳。第二部分分析了瑕疵出资股权应有的限制。第三部分进行瑕疵出资股权转让合同效力的研究。首先列明了理论界和司法实务中对瑕疵出资股权转让合同的效力所存在的不同学说。然后笔者在采纳可撤销说的基础上,对可撤销说提出了一定的修改意见,以期能更符合理论和实践的要求。第四部分分析了我国瑕疵出资股权转让后的相应责任界定。提出了对《公司法司法解释三》的一些完善建议。结语部分对全文进行了综述和总结。
[Abstract]:The prerequisite for equity transfer is that shareholders acquire shares through the way they contribute to the target company. The new Company Law, which came into effect on 2006, allows shareholders to contribute in instalments and encourages the diversity of non-monetary contributions. This is conducive to the healthy development of the economy, but the construction of the integrity system of the whole society in our country is lagging behind at present, which objectively intensifies the risk of the defect of shareholders' capital contribution, which leads to the existence of defective stock right. The problems of defective shares in the process of transfer emerge one after another, which seriously impacts the stability and harmony of our country's social economy. The introduction of the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the application of the PRC Company Law (3) > ['] has filled some gaps in the provisions on the transfer of defective shares in the past commercial laws and judicial interpretations in China. However, the validity of the defective equity transfer contract is still not made a clear determination; in the transfer of defective shares, there are still some responsibilities to be improved. Through combing and systematic analysis of the theory and practice, the author synthetically considers the legal value objectives of social economic order, economic transaction security, economic transaction efficiency, social fairness and justice, and adopts inductive analysis and deductive reasoning. As well as the empirical research method, put forward some own opinion, hope to provide beneficial help to solve these problems. The full text is divided into three parts: introduction, text, and conclusion:. The introduction briefly describes the purpose and significance of writing, explains the limitations of the scope of research, and points out the main contents of the article. The first part of the text makes a theoretical analysis of defective equity. Firstly, the concept of defective equity is defined. Secondly, the common classification of defective equity is summarized. The second part analyzes the limitation of defective investment equity. In the third part, the author studies the validity of the equity transfer contract with defective capital contribution. Firstly, it lists the different theories in theory and judicial practice on the validity of the equity transfer contract of defective capital contribution. Then the author adopts the theory of revocability. Some suggestions on revocability theory are put forward in order to meet the requirements of theory and practice. In the 4th part, the author analyzes the definition of the corresponding liability after the transfer of the defective capital contribution in China, and puts forward some suggestions for the perfection of the Judicial interpretation of Company Law. The conclusion part summarizes and summarizes the full text.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】