论有限责任公司的僵局及对策
发布时间:2018-03-07 19:26
本文选题:公司僵局 切入点:司法困境 出处:《河北大学》2010年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:有限责任公司是一种比较特殊的企业形态。它与其他企业形态的重要区别之一,即在于它不是企业组织自然演进的必然产物,其本身也没有其他企业那样深层的历史经验或文化传统底蕴。正如有些学者所言,有限责任公司完全是德国立法者之桌上创造物,乃德国法学之最天才的创造物。1892年德国的《有限责任公司法》的颁行标志着有限责任公司制度的诞生。有限责任公司基本上吸收了其他几种公司形式的优点,而避免了它们的不足:股东承担有限责任且人数有限,易于管理,公司业务保密,设立简单,此种形式尤其适合中小企业。因此,虽然在规模上有限责任公司比不过股份有限公司,但在数量上有限责任公司则是遥遥领先。我国公司法研究起步较晚,且在很长时间内学者们的关注点又大多集中于股份有限公司,因此有限责任公司的很多病症并没有为研究者们所重视,这与有限责任公司在我国经济生活中所起的重要作用是极不相符的,应当引起我们的反思。 公司僵局是指公司在存续运行过程中由于股东或董事之间发生分争,且彼此不愿妥协而处于僵持状况,导致公司不能按照法定程序做出决策或者即便做出也无法被有效的执行,从而使公司陷入无法正常运转,甚至瘫痪的事实状态。在司法实务中,公司僵局一般存在于有限责任公司中,特别是一些股东人数较少,公司规模较小的公司,这是因为有限责任公司有封闭性、人合性等特征,这些特征与公司僵局的产生有着千丝万缕的联系。公司一旦出现僵局,公司完全瘫痪,无法做出决定,也无法采取任何行动,这必然会导致公司利益严重受损。首先,对公司本身来说,公司不能正常生产经营,公司资产日益消耗和毁损;其次对股东来说,股东权无法行使,股东利益受到很大的伤害,再次,对于公司的债权人来说,其合法权益也不能有效的维护。公司僵局多发于有限责任公司,而有限责任公司因为适应了市场经济和中小企业发展的现实需要所以在我国大量存在,因此,防止公司僵局的发生迫在眉睫。
[Abstract]:Limited liability company is a kind of special enterprise form, which is one of the important differences between it and other enterprise forms, that is, it is not the inevitable outcome of the natural evolution of enterprise organization. It does not have the deep historical experience or cultural heritage of any other enterprise. As some scholars have said, limited liability companies are entirely a creation on the table of German legislators. The enactment of the German Limited liability Company Act in 1892 marked the birth of the limited liability company system. The limited liability company basically absorbed the advantages of several other forms of company. And avoided their shortcomings: limited liability and limited number of shareholders, easy to manage, confidentiality of company business, simple establishment, this form is especially suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises. Although the limited liability company is far better than the joint stock limited company in the scale, but the limited liability company is far ahead in the quantity. And for a long time, most of the scholars' attention was focused on the joint stock limited company, so many diseases of the limited liability company were not taken seriously by the researchers. This is very inconsistent with the important role played by limited liability companies in China's economic life, and should cause our reflection. Corporate deadlock refers to the deadlock in which the company is in a state of deadlock due to the division between shareholders or directors and their unwillingness to compromise with each other in the course of their continued operation. The fact that the company is unable to make decisions in accordance with legal procedures or, even if made, can not be effectively executed, thus causing the company to fall into a state of fact that it is unable to function properly or even to be paralyzed. In judicial practice, Corporate deadlock generally exists in limited liability companies, especially those with a small number of shareholders and smaller size, which is due to the closed and human nature of limited liability companies. These characteristics are inextricably linked to the emergence of corporate gridlock. Once a deadlock occurs, the company is completely paralyzed, unable to make a decision and unable to take any action, which is bound to cause serious damage to the company's interests. For the company itself, the company cannot produce and operate normally, and the assets of the company are increasingly consumed and destroyed. Secondly, for shareholders, the rights of shareholders cannot be exercised, and the interests of shareholders are greatly harmed. Again, for the creditors of the company, Its legitimate rights and interests can not be effectively safeguarded. The corporate deadlock is mostly in limited liability companies, and limited liability companies exist in large numbers in our country because they adapt to the actual needs of the market economy and the development of small and medium-sized enterprises. It is urgent to prevent an impasse in the company.
【学位授予单位】:河北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D912.29
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 黄美园,周彦;我国公司僵局司法救济制度之构建[J];法律适用;2004年05期
2 李泫永,官欣荣;公司僵局与司法救济[J];法学;2004年04期
3 王德强;;公司僵局与司法救济研究[J];法制与社会;2007年03期
4 马秀群;公司僵局的司法救济——公司司法解散[J];郑州经济管理干部学院学报;2004年02期
5 马其家;;论公司僵局及其解决机制[J];西北师大学报(社会科学版);2007年03期
6 郑言;;试论公司僵局的司法解散制度[J];烟台教育学院学报;2005年04期
7 甘培忠;公司司法解散:《公司法》中说不出的痛[J];中国律师;2002年09期
,本文编号:1580661
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/1580661.html