我国公司非破产清算法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-10 14:32

本文选题：非破产清算　切入点：清算责任人　出处：《华东政法学院》2005年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：健康有序的市场环境中,公司面对市场应该是能进能退的。现行有关公司法律对公司准入机制研究的比较多,但对于公司退出市场的有关制度却研究相对较少。我国现行与公司解散有关的法律基本以破产法律为主,但是破产解散并不是我国公司解散的唯一原因。公司经营期届满、公司陷入僵局、股东决定关闭公司、公司被责令关闭、公司被吊销营业执照等等原因都可能导致公司解散并退出市场。这个环节涉及公司股东、债权人、公司员工等各方利益,需要有法律进行规制,但就目前的立法状况而言还是明显不够的。在本文第一章中,笔者由清算概念入手,介绍了公司非破产清算的基本概念、导致公司非破产清算的原因、非破产清算制度的价值意义;又分析了目前我国关于公司非破产清算的法律制度,指出法律规定中存在的部分概念不清、责任不明等问题都导致了操作当中的混乱。第二章是关于公司非破产清算的清算责任人的探讨,笔者分析了清算责任人的概念及其与清算人、清算活动主体等概念的差异。认为有限责任公司的清算责任人是全体股东;股份有限公司的清算责任人是在公司董事会、监事会及高管人员中派有代表的股东。另外要求清算责任人承担责任的主体,不应局限于目前的债权人,在一定情况下,公司股东、公司员工等相关利害关系人也可以向法院提起诉讼,要求清算责任人承担清算责任。如果因为清算责任人的过错导致债权人等利害关系人利益受损的,清算责任人应当承担侵权赔偿责任。第三章中,笔者分析了公司非破产清算的清算人的有关问题。指出应当统一
[Abstract]:In a healthy and orderly market environment, companies should be able to advance and retreat in the face of the market. However, there are relatively few studies on the relevant system of company withdrawal from the market. The current laws relating to the dissolution of companies in China are basically based on the bankruptcy law, but bankruptcy dissolution is not the only reason for the dissolution of companies in our country. The company has reached an impasse, the shareholders have decided to close the company, the company has been ordered to close down, the company has been revoked its business license, and other reasons may lead to the dissolution of the company and its withdrawal from the market. This link involves the interests of the shareholders, creditors, employees, and other parties of the company. There is a need for legal regulation, but the current legislative situation is clearly inadequate. In the first chapter, the author starts with the concept of liquidation, introduces the basic concept of non-bankruptcy liquidation of the company, causes the non-bankruptcy liquidation of the company, and the value significance of the non-bankruptcy liquidation system; It also analyzes the current legal system of non-bankruptcy liquidation in our country, and points out that some problems in the legal provisions, such as unclear concepts and unclear responsibilities, have led to confusion in the operation. The second chapter is about the company non-bankruptcy liquidation of the person responsible for liquidation, the author analyzes the concept of the person responsible for liquidation and the liquidation of the main body of the concept of differences. The person responsible for liquidation of a company limited by shares is the shareholder who is represented on the board of directors, the board of supervisors and the senior executives of the company. In addition, the main body that requires the person responsible for liquidation to bear responsibility should not be limited to the current creditors, and under certain circumstances, The shareholders, employees, and other relevant interested parties of the company may also file a lawsuit with the court to demand that the person responsible for liquidation be liable for liquidation. If the interests of the creditors or other interested parties are damaged because of the fault of the person responsible for liquidation, The person responsible for liquidation shall bear the liability for tort compensation. In the third chapter, the author analyzes the relevant problems of the liquidator of the company, and points out that it should be unified.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2005
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【引证文献】