当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 公司法论文 >

论公司资本多数决

发布时间:2018-03-12 12:50

  本文选题:资本多数决 切入点:表决规则 出处:《宁波大学》2010年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:本文以资本多数决为主线,涉及公司表决权制度的一般考察、资本多数决的价值分析、资本多数决实现的具体形式以及资本多数决制度的修正与完善。其中文章重点探讨了公司制和合作社、公司股东大会和公司董事会、有限责任公司中有条件的人数多数决进行比较考察、资本多数决的滥用和对资本多数决的修正。资本多数决是公司法中的重要原则,也是研究公司制度的重大突破口。 首先,为什么是股东享有公司事务的表决权而不是其他人,即涉及公司表决权的归属问题。股东享有公司表决权,其他参与者不享有该项权力,是由这些主体和股东具有不同的地位和法律属性所决定的。表决规制经历了一个从一致决到多数决的过程,这是由团体行为的逻辑所决定的,公司作为一个社团法人,也遵循了团体意思决定的规则和方法——多数决。“一股一权”原则是资本多数决产生的基础,股份是股份公司资本的基本单位,以此计算每股东所持有的表决权数。 其次,通过表决制度的比较考察,论证资本多数决的价值所在。本文试图通过讨论三种情况下人数决的规定,得出资本多数决才是股份公司资本制度中的民主。一是阐述合作社采取的表决机制以及合作社采取人数决的原因分析。二是论述公司董事会的表决规则。三是讨论公司法第43条的规定,我国公司法允许有限责任公司就普通决议事项,通过公司章程的例外规定采取人数决,包括有限公司中股权对外转让也规定采取人数决。 再次,资本多数决通常有三种实现形式:普通决议也即简单多数决、特别决议和需要全体股东同意的决议。对于需要全体一致同意的事项,在国外公司法中有所规定,在我国公司法中没有涉及。 最后,资本多数决原则只是一种制度性的安排,并非最理想化的规则。在实践中往往会出现控股股东滥用资本多数决的现象。因此,从我国现行公司法的规定入手,分析现有的各项配套制度,对资本多数决的修正和完善提出相应的建议具有重要的实践意义。
[Abstract]:This article takes the capital majority decision as the main line, involves the general investigation of the voting right system of the company, the value analysis of the capital majority decision, The specific forms of the realization of capital majority decision and the revision and perfection of capital majority decision system. The article focuses on the corporate system and cooperatives, corporate shareholders' general meeting and company board of directors. The conditional majority decision of limited liability company is compared, the abuse of capital majority decision and the amendment of capital majority decision. Capital majority decision is an important principle in company law, and it is also a great breakthrough in the study of company system. First of all, why do shareholders enjoy voting rights in the affairs of the company and not others, that is, the ownership of the voting rights of the company. The shareholders have the right to vote in the company, and the other participants do not enjoy that right. The voting regulation has gone through a process from unanimous decision to majority decision, which is determined by the logic of group behavior. The principle of "one share, one right" is the basis of capital majority decision, and shares are the basic unit of the capital of a joint-stock company, so as to calculate the number of voting rights held by each shareholder. Secondly, through the comparative investigation of voting system, the paper demonstrates the value of capital majority decision. It is concluded that the majority of capital is the democracy in the capital system of joint-stock companies. One is to expound the voting mechanism adopted by cooperatives and the reasons for the number of people adopted by cooperatives. The other is to discuss the voting rules of the board of directors of the company. Third, to discuss the voting rules of the board of directors. On the provisions of Article 43 of the Company Law, The company law of our country allows limited liability company to adopt the decision of the number of people through the exception of the articles of association, including the transfer of stock right to the outside of the limited company. Thirdly, capital majority decisions usually come in three forms: ordinary resolutions, that is, simple majority decisions, special resolutions, and resolutions requiring the consent of all shareholders. In our country company law does not deal with. Finally, the principle of capital majority decision is only a kind of institutional arrangement, not the most idealized rule. In practice, there is often a phenomenon of controlling shareholders abusing capital majority decision. It is of great practical significance to analyze the existing supporting systems and put forward corresponding suggestions for the revision and perfection of capital majority decision.
【学位授予单位】:宁波大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D922.291.91

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 江华;陶娟;;完善我国股东代表诉讼制度的法律思考[J];北京工业大学学报(社会科学版);2005年04期

2 陈芳;;对我国累积投票制度的反思——兼评《公司法》第106条之规定[J];西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年04期

3 蔡元庆,龚建凤;资本多数决原则与中小股东利益的协调[J];当代法学;2003年11期

4 刘俊海;《公司法》的修改与解释:以司法权的适度干预为中心[J];法律适用;2005年03期

5 段厚省;股东代表诉讼中公司和其他股东的地位[J];法学杂志;1998年05期

6 李长健,冯果;我国农民合作经济组织立法若干问题研究(上)[J];法学评论;2005年04期

7 肖海军;危兆宾;;公司表决权例外排除制度研究[J];法学评论;2006年03期

8 黄孝山;;股东大会表决权制度与中小股东权益的保护[J];法制与经济(下半月);2007年10期

9 严丽莹;;有限责任公司股权转让法律问题研究[J];法制与社会;2008年18期

10 周凯军;论资本多数决及其限制──为了少数股股东的利益[J];河北法学;2000年01期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 黄安生 (中国人民大学法学院教授) 郑小敏 (中国人民大学法学院博士研究生);[N];法制日报;2005年



本文编号:1601647

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/1601647.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户fd818***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com