有限责任公司股权转让法律制度研究——基于我国《公司法》第71条规范之解释

发布时间：2018-03-18 19:29

本文选题：股权转让　切入点：任意性规范　出处：《政治与法律》2017年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国《公司法》第71条对有限责任公司股权转让的规则作了基本规定,其对公司章程以及默认条款对股权转让限定范围未作阐明,理论界与实务界的理解和适用存在分歧。有限责任公司股权转让法律规范具有任意性特点,可以排除或替代公司法的创新功能。公司章程作为裁判法源地位的制度性安排已确立,应区分制定公司章程与修订公司章程的不同机理对限制股权转让效力的影响。对于公司章程中"禁止股权转出"或"强制股权转让"的约定,应作具体分析后才能在司法上予以适用。应将其他股东同意权和股东优先购买权作为公司法上的标准法律文本。应坚持私法自治原则,司法谨慎介入公司运营空间。对于股东与股东外之第三人订立的股权转让合同应当依法确认其合同效力。法律规范解释应肯定"其他股东同意权"与"股东优先购买权"以及股东对外转让股权合同有效,以更大的自治空间与效力范围厘定公司法规则任意性与强制性之间的界限并平衡各方利益。
[Abstract]:Article 71 of the Company Law of our country has made the basic stipulation to the limited liability company's stock right transfer rule, its to the company articles of association and the default clause does not make the elaboration to the stock right transfer limit scope, There are differences in understanding and application between theoretical and practical circles. The legal norms of equity transfer of limited liability companies have arbitrary characteristics. It can exclude or replace the innovative function of the company law. The institutional arrangement of the articles of association as the source of adjudication has been established. A distinction should be made between the different mechanisms of formulating a company's articles of association and revising its articles of association on the effect of restricting the transfer of shares. As for the agreement in the articles of association "prohibiting the transfer of shares" or "compulsory transfer of shares", The right of consent of other shareholders and the right of prior purchase of shareholders should be regarded as the standard legal texts of company law, and the principle of autonomy of private law should be adhered to. The legal norm should confirm the validity of the contract. The legal norm should confirm the "consent right of other shareholders" and the "shareholder priority" in the contract of equity transfer concluded between the shareholders and the third party outside the shareholders, and the legal norms should be interpreted as affirming the "right of consent of other shareholders" and "the priority of shareholders". The right to purchase "and the shareholder's contract to transfer shares to the outside world shall be valid," To define the boundary between arbitrariness and compulsion of company law rules and balance the interests of all parties with greater autonomy and scope of validity.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学民商法学院;
【基金】：广东省广州市中级人民法院2014年度重点调研课题“有限责任公司股权转让司法保护研究”的研究成果
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】