公司司法解散的实践与若干问题探讨

发布时间：2018-03-29 20:39

本文选题：公司法　切入点：司法解散　出处：《中国政法大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国2005年修订、2006年施行的《中华人民共和国公司法》第183条引入、确立了公司司法解散制度,赋予股东在公司陷入僵局、出现经营管理严重困难之时,得以向法院诉请强制解散公司、收回出资、免遭更大利益损失的权利。毫无疑问,这一制度对维护股东合法权益、完善我国公司法律体系方面具有重大意义。然而深究其里,不难发现我国现行法律条文对于该制度并未予以清晰、详尽的规定,而司法实践中对于该条文的适用更是出现了许多不确定、存在争议性的问题。本文立足于《公司法》第183条的条文含义,以十年来我国司法实践中对公司解散诉讼判决的分析为基础,从而对现实实践中该制度的适用予以刻画描述,发掘其中立法空隙、司法争议存在之处,并结合现阶段学术界的理论探讨,试图为解决实践中存在的问题提供解决思路,以推动、完善我国公司司法解散制度。文章主体分为两个部分。第一章是对十年来司法实践中公司解散诉讼判决的整理分析,依据2005年《公司法》的修订、2008年相关司法解释的出台,进而以时间为界限划分三个阶段,对每个阶段中的案例予以归纳总结,并对于每个阶段的司法实践予以评价,从而清晰地梳理出解散公司诉讼在我国司法实践中的演化脉络,以及公司司法解散制度相关条文对于司法实践的影响。第二章是对第一章案例分析中所发掘的一些问题的讨论。针对我国立法、司法中存在的空隙、争议,笔者试图结合相关理论探讨,对上述问题予以定性,从而提供解决问题的思路,以弥补现行法律之空白、司法之不足。文章的最终结论部分将对全文予以总结概述,揭示现阶段我国公司司法解散制度的困惑,呼吁关注该制度的核心价值之所在,实现该制度的设计意义。
[Abstract]:Revised in 2005 and introduced in Article 183 of the Company Law of the people's Republic of China in 2006, the system of judicial dissolution of the company was established, and the shareholders were given the right to face serious difficulties in the management and management of the company when the company was deadlocked. To be able to apply to the court for the compulsory dissolution of the company, the right to recover its capital contribution and to avoid greater loss of interest. There is no doubt that this system is of great significance in safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of shareholders and improving the legal system of our country's companies. It is not difficult to find that the current legal provisions of our country are not clear and detailed, and in judicial practice, there are many uncertain and controversial problems in the application of this provision. Based on the meaning of Article 183 of Company Law, this article is based on the analysis of the judgment of dissolution of company in judicial practice in our country in the past ten years, so as to describe the application of this system in practical practice and explore the gaps in legislation. In order to promote and perfect the system of judicial dissolution of companies in China, this paper tries to provide solutions to the problems in practice by combining the theoretical discussion of the present academic circles with the existence of judicial disputes. The main body of the article is divided into two parts. The first chapter is the analysis of the judicial practice in the past ten years, according to the revision of the Company Law in 2005, the introduction of the relevant judicial interpretation in 2008. Then divide the three stages with time as the limit, sum up the cases in each stage, and evaluate the judicial practice in each stage, so as to clearly sort out the evolution of the dissolution of company litigation in the judicial practice of our country. The second chapter is the discussion of some problems excavated in the case analysis of the first chapter. In view of the gaps and disputes in the legislation and judicature of our country, the second chapter is about the influence of the relevant provisions of the judicial dissolution system on the judicial practice. The author tries to combine the relevant theory discussion, gives the qualitative analysis to the above question, thus provides the thought of solving the problem, in order to make up the gap of the current law and the insufficiency of the judicature. The final conclusion part of the article will summarize the full text. This paper reveals the confusion of the system of judicial dissolution of companies in our country at present, and appeals to pay attention to the core value of the system and to realize the design significance of the system.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】