股东代表诉讼当事人范围界定

发布时间：2018-04-03 07:03

本文选题：股东代表诉讼　切入点：当事人范围　出处：《湘潭大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：新《公司法》第152条对股东代表诉讼的规定标志着股东代表诉讼制度在我国的正式确立,也意味着我国在完善公司治理的道路上迈出了重要的一步。在整个股东代表诉讼制度体系中,对当事人范围的界定无疑是重中之重,是股东代表诉讼程序能够顺利运行的基石。但新《公司法》对于当事人的规定过于原则化,且存在着一些争议颇多之处,例如对其他股东以及公司在诉讼中的地位并未作规定,容易造成司法实践中的混乱局面。本文立足于我国的立法、司法实践,通过对美国、法国、日本等国家地区的股东代表诉讼制度的考察,针对《公司法》的相关规定提出建议。全文分为五个部分,第一章是对股东代表诉讼制度的概述,包括股东代表诉讼的来源、性质以及意义等。第二章是对股东代表诉讼原告范围的界定,建议参照法国与德国的立法经验,按照公司资本的大小来确定对原告起诉时持股比例的要求,并提出对原告的主观意图进行限制。第三章对股东代表诉讼被告范围进行了界定,提出用列举的方式在法条中明确被告的范围,并建议法院禁止被告反诉并追究在公司内部救济程序有明显失职或与被告串谋行为高管的责任。第四章对公司及其他股东在代表诉讼中应处的地位进行了激烈探讨,并结合域外经验及中国国情得出了相关结论。第五章对与股东代表诉讼相关联制度的完善提出了一些建议。
[Abstract]:The provisions of Article 152 of the New Company Law on shareholder Representative Litigation signify the formal establishment of the shareholder Representative Litigation system in China, and also mean that our country has taken an important step on the road of perfecting corporate governance.In the whole system of shareholder representative litigation, the definition of the scope of the parties is undoubtedly the most important, which is the cornerstone of the smooth operation of the shareholder representative litigation procedure.However, the provisions of the new Company Law are too principled for the parties, and there are some controversial points, such as other shareholders and the position of the company in the litigation are not provided for, which can easily lead to confusion in judicial practice.Based on the legislation and judicial practice of our country, this paper makes some suggestions on the relevant provisions of the Company Law through the investigation of the shareholder representative litigation system in the United States, France, Japan and other countries.The first chapter is an overview of shareholder representative litigation system, including the source, nature and significance of shareholder representative litigation.The second chapter is the definition of the scope of the plaintiff in the shareholder's representative action. It is suggested that according to the legal experience of France and Germany, the requirement of the proportion of the shares in the plaintiff should be determined according to the size of the company's capital, and the subjective intention of the plaintiff should be restricted.The third chapter defines the scope of the defendant in the shareholder's representative action, and proposes to define the scope of the defendant in the article of law by means of enumeration.It is recommended that the court prohibit the defendant from counterpleading and hold senior executives responsible for apparent negligence or conspiracy with the defendant in the company's internal relief proceedings.The fourth chapter discusses the status of the company and other shareholders in the representative litigation, and draws the relevant conclusions in combination with the overseas experience and China's national conditions.The fifth chapter puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of the system related to shareholder representative litigation.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】