当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 公司法论文 >

论有限责任公司股东困境的法律救济

发布时间:2018-04-11 13:16

  本文选题:有限责任公司 + 股东困境 ; 参考:《华东政法大学》2011年硕士论文


【摘要】:德国在1892年创造了有限责任公司制度,该制度被称为是“立法者的发明”。有限责任公司同时具备了资合性和人合性的特点,同时公司规模比较小,股东往往兼任着管理者,公司的管理成本低、效率比较高,实践中中小企业往往采取有限责任公司的组织形式。但是同样是因为其兼具资合性和人合性,二者之间的矛盾及固有的闭锁性往往使得有限责任公司的中小股东陷入“股东困境”,这是有限责任公司所特有的问题,也是实践中经常出现的状况。但是我国的公司法重点监管的公司组织形式是股份有限公司,给予了有限责任公司极大的自治的权利,长期以来都漠视有限责任公司的治理问题。 我国在2005年出台了新《公司法》,其后又颁布了三个司法解释,对有限责任公司的股东困境问题提供了法律救济,但是却不够完善,或者是规定过为粗糙,不具有可操作性,或者是根本没有相关的规定。在此情况下,本文运用比较法、案例分析法对有限责任公司的股东困境问题的法律救济进行分析,确定相应的程序,并借鉴国外的立法经验完善实体法方面的规定。 本文首先是导言部分,通过股东纠纷的案件引出股东困境及法律救济的相关问题。正文具体分成六章: 第一章概述有限责任公司的股东困境问题。这一章分为四节,第一节讲述股东困境的概念和表现形式;第二节讲述股东困境的成因,即法理上的成因及现实中的成因;第三节讲述对股东困境进行法律救济的必要性;第四节论述股东困境法律救济的法理基础。 第二章讲述各国对股东困境的救济制度,总结各国股东困境救济的共性和特点。 第三章讲述的是我国股东困境的立法现状,并对相关的制度进行简要的解析。 第四章重点讲述股东困境的法律救济制度其中的一种,即异议股东股份回购请求权,详述其立法现状、诉讼程序及如何完善相关的制度。 第五章重点讲述股东困境的另一种法律救济途径——股东请求解散公司之诉,详述其立法现状、诉讼程序,及如何完善相应的制度。 第六章,讲述的是除了上述两种制度以外的其他救济方式,包括司法方面的救济及司法之外的救济,即章程预订和仲裁制度。
[Abstract]:Germany created the limited-liability company system in 1892, which was called a "legislator's invention."Limited liability companies have the characteristics of both capital and people. At the same time, the size of the company is relatively small, the shareholders are often also managers, the management cost of the company is low, and the efficiency is relatively high.In practice, small and medium-sized enterprises often take the form of limited liability companies.However, it is also because of the combination of capital and person, the contradiction between the two and the inherent closeness often make the minority shareholders of the limited liability company fall into the "shareholder dilemma", which is the unique problem of the limited liability company.Also is the situation which often appears in practice.However, the company organization form of the key supervision of company law in our country is the joint stock limited company, which has given the limited liability company the great autonomy right, and has ignored the limited liability company's governance problem for a long time.In 2005, our country issued the new Company Law, and then issued three judicial explanations, which provided legal relief to the shareholders' plight of limited liability company, but it was not perfect, or had been stipulated as rough and not operable.Or there are no rules at all.In this case, this paper uses comparative law and case analysis method to analyze the legal relief of shareholders' plight of limited liability company, to determine the corresponding procedure, and to use foreign legislative experience to perfect the provisions of substantive law.The first part of this paper is the introduction, which leads to the shareholder dilemma and the related problems of legal remedy through shareholder dispute cases.The text is divided into six chapters:The first chapter summarizes the shareholder dilemma of limited liability company.This chapter is divided into four sections, the first is about the concept and manifestation of shareholders' plight, the second is about the causes of shareholders' plight, the third is about the necessity of legal remedy to shareholders' plight.The fourth section discusses the legal basis of legal relief for shareholders'plight.The second chapter describes the relief system of shareholders' plight, summarizes the commonness and characteristics of shareholders' plight relief.The third chapter is about the current legislation of shareholder dilemma in China, and briefly analyzes the relevant system.The fourth chapter focuses on one of the legal relief systems for shareholders' plight, that is, the right to ask for share repurchase by dissenting shareholders, including the current legislative situation, litigation procedures and how to improve the relevant system.The fifth chapter focuses on another way of legal relief for shareholders' plight-shareholders' petition for dissolution of the company, detailed legislative status, litigation procedures, and how to improve the corresponding system.The sixth chapter deals with other remedies in addition to the above two systems, including judicial relief and judicial relief, that is, the constitution reservation and arbitration system.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D922.291.91

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 黄美园,周彦;我国公司僵局司法救济制度之构建[J];法律适用;2004年05期

2 鲍为民;美国法上的公司僵局处理制度及其启示[J];法商研究;2005年03期

3 李泫永,官欣荣;公司僵局与司法救济[J];法学;2004年04期

4 范黎红;;有限责任公司司法裁判解散的困惑及法理思考[J];法学;2007年04期

5 郭文婧;;我国新公司法中的公司僵局处理制度评析[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2006年02期

6 罗培新;;新《公司法》框架下的司法裁判困境[J];华东政法学院学报;2006年01期

7 周海博;;我国有限责任公司异议股东股份回购法律制度重构[J];辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年05期

8 石晓莉;王旭刚;;论公司司法解散制度的完善[J];四川师范大学学报(社会科学版);2007年03期

9 张爱菊;;论有限责任公司异议股东股份回购请求权[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2011年01期

10 李曙光;;新《公司法》中破解“公司僵局”制度安排的探讨[J];武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版);2006年03期

相关重要报纸文章 前2条

1 中国政法大学教授、博士生导师 赵旭东;[N];人民法院报;2002年

2 林晓镍;[N];人民法院报;2002年



本文编号:1736162

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/1736162.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户5cb2e***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com