董事经营判断规则研究

发布时间：2018-05-10 13:43

  本文选题：经营判断规则 + 董事注意义务　； 参考：《烟台大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：董事是公司财产管理和经营的受托人或受信人,他们必须对公司“尽职”,这就是公司法和公司章程规定的注意义务。董事注意义务作为一种法律约束机制,有维护财产安全和提高资本运作效率的法律价值,但也暴露出忽略董事合法权益和阻碍公司追求利益最大化的缺陷。而经营判断规则实现了董事和公司利益之间的均衡,弥补了传统董事注意义务的不足,一定程度上协调了两种价值之间的冲突,并通过实行行为标准与司法审查标准相分离,以及推定规则和证明责任分配的制度实现了对传统董事注意义务的修正。我国2005年修订的《公司法》明确规定了董事的注意义务,采用的表述方式为董事的“勤勉义务”,但对董事注意义务的内容和行为标准等都未作明确的规定,对在美国、英国、德国、日本公司法中已经日趋成熟的经营判断规则也只字未提。我国公司法中的董事注意义务相对于其它国家而言是传统的董事注意义务。通过实证分析也可以发现我国司法实践中董事违反注意义务的案件也时有涌现,倘若我国能克服经营判断规则在我国的实行障碍而将此规则引入,势必会对我国注意义务的完善起到不小的助力。
[Abstract]:Directors are the trustees or fiduciaries of the management and operation of the company's property. They must "do their duty" to the company, which is the duty of care stipulated in the Company Law and the articles of Association. As a kind of legal restraint mechanism, directors' duty of care has the legal value of maintaining property security and improving the efficiency of capital operation, but it also exposes the defects of neglecting the directors' legitimate rights and interests and hindering the company from pursuing the maximization of interests. The rule of business judgment realizes the balance between directors and company interests, makes up for the deficiency of traditional directors' duty of care, coordinates the conflict between the two values to a certain extent, and separates the standard of conduct from the standard of judicial review. The rules of presumption and the system of burden of proof distribution realize the revision of traditional directors' duty of care. The Company Law revised in 2005 clearly stipulates the duty of care of directors and adopts the expression of "duty of diligence" of directors. However, the contents and standards of directors' duty of care are not clearly stipulated, and there are no clear provisions on the duty of care in the United States and Britain. Germany, Japan's company law has become increasingly mature business judgment rules are not mentioned. The duty of care of directors in our company law is the traditional duty of care compared with other countries. Through the empirical analysis, we can also find that the cases of directors violating the duty of care also appear in our judicial practice. If our country can overcome the obstacles to the implementation of the rules of business judgment in our country, we can introduce this rule into our country. It will certainly help to improve the duty of care in our country.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D922.291.91
，

本文编号：1869539