公司僵局的救济和预防

发布时间：2018-05-13 06:38

本文选题：公司僵局 + 司法解散　；参考：《西南政法大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 公司的经营管理主要依靠股东(大)会、董事会等机构的运行,当公司股东或董事之间产生矛盾,上述机构无法召开会议或无法作出有效的决议,公司就陷入僵局,公司僵局对公司、股东、公司的债权人等的利益都会造成严重的危害,而此前对该类案件法院是不予受理的。我国《公司法》于2005年修订后,第183条规定了股东可以通过司法途径解散公司以打破公司僵局,为解决公司僵局问题提供了一条司法救济途径,随后的《公司法》司法解释(二)对该制度进行了解释,完善了公司治理机制,但规定比较原则性,不易操作,且通过解散公司来打破僵局成本太高,并非最优的救济措施。本文结合《公司法》第183条及司法解释,对公司僵局的概念、原因、危害、司法解散制度以及其他替代救济措施等问题展开阐述。本文共分四部分。第一部分介绍公司僵局的概念、特征以及公司僵局的主要分类;第二部分从有限责任公司的封闭性、资本维持原则以及资本多数决制度等方面,阐述有限责任公司产生公司僵局的原因以及公司僵局公司及股东等的利益所造成的损害。第三部分参照美国、德国等对公司僵局采取的措施,并结合我国的实际情况,对《公司法》第183条规定的司法解散制度适用的条件、穷尽内部救济方式和公司主体维持等原则进行了探讨,对因公司形成僵局后股东要求司法解散过程中的造成的不足之处如成本过高,浪费社会资源、容易引发机会主义诉讼等进行阐述,并对替代性救济措施——强制股份收购进行了理论和实践的探讨,最后针对我国实践,提出其他替代性救济措施,如公司分立、机构诉讼等措施,以期在发生公司僵局时,当事人能够根据实际情况提出请求,人民法院能够灵活运用上述措施,针对个案选择适合的解决办法,化解矛盾,以维护公司、公司股东及债权人等的合法权益,维持正常的经济秩序。第四部分提出公司僵局的预防措施,如股东事先约定公司章程的内容等。
[Abstract]:The operation and management of a company mainly depends on the operation of the shareholders (large), the board of directors and other institutions. When there is a contradiction between the shareholders or the directors of the company, the above institutions cannot hold a meeting or can not make effective resolutions. The company is in a deadlock, and the corporate deadlock will cause serious harm to the interests of the company, the shareholders and the creditors of the company. The court of this kind of case is inadmissible. After the amendment of the company law of China in 2005, the 183rd stipulates that the shareholders can dissolve the company through judicial channels to break the company deadlock and provide a way of judicial relief to solve the problem of corporate deadlock. Then, the company law, judicial interpretation (two) has explained the system and perfected the public. It is not the best remedy to break the deadlock cost by dissolving the company, and it is not the best remedy. This article combines the 183rd articles of the company law and the judicial explanation, and expounds the concept, the cause, the harm of the company deadlock, the judicial dissolution system and the other alternative relief measures.
This article is divided into four parts. The first part introduces the concept and characteristics of the corporate deadlock and the main classification of the company deadlock. The second part expounds the reasons for the company deadlock in the limited liability company and the interests of the company and shareholders from the limited liability company's closeness, the capital maintenance principle and the capital majority system. The third part, referring to the measures taken by the United States and Germany on the corporate deadlock, and combined with the actual conditions of our country, discussed the conditions applicable to the judicial dissolution system of the company law and the 183rd provisions, the exhaustion of the internal relief methods and the maintenance of the company's main body, and the judicial solution to the shareholders' requirements after the company has formed a deadlock. The inadequacies in the process of dispersion, such as high cost, waste of social resources, easy to trigger opportunism litigation, are discussed, and the theory and practice of alternative relief measures, compulsory stock acquisition, are discussed. In the end, other alternative relief measures, such as corporate separation and institutional litigation, are put forward in accordance with the practice of our country. In the event of the deadlock in the company, the parties can make a request according to the actual situation. The people's court can use the above measures flexibly, select the appropriate solutions to the case, dissolve the contradictions, maintain the legitimate rights and interests of the company, the company shareholders and the creditors, and maintain the normal economic order. The fourth part puts forward the prevention of the company deadlock. Measures such as the shareholders' prior agreement on the contents of the articles of association.

【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【引证文献】