股东大会通知程序瑕疵研究

发布时间：2018-05-17 03:21

本文选题：股东大会 + 程序瑕疵　；参考：《西南政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：股东大会是公司的权力机构,是全体股东行使股东权利,实现公司治理的地方。然而股东大会是公司的非常设机构,其仅以会议形式存在,只有在召开股东大会会议时才作为公司机关存在。它的正常运行是通过召开定期股东大会和临时股东大会的形式来实现。此时就需要设计一系列的程序来保障股东参与公司事务的管理,通过股东大会主张权利,维护自身的权益。本文从股东大会通知程序出发,通过对一则案例的分析,探讨股东大会通知程序中存在的瑕疵,以及存在这些瑕疵时将产生何种法律后果的问题。全文分为四个部分,共计一万七千余字,主要框架如下: 第一部分为引言,主要通过对一则股东大会决议撤销纠纷案例的介绍,分析该案件存在的争议焦点,从而引出本文的研究对象。即:股东大会通知程序在何种情况下构成瑕疵,以及构成瑕疵时对股东大会决议效力的影响。第二部分,股东大会通知程序瑕疵构成。本部分通过对一个合法合章的通知程序的论述,去分析在何种情况下将导致股东大会通知程序上的瑕疵。通常情况下,当股东大会通知存在违法或者违章情形时,构成通知程序上的瑕疵。但是又存在例外情形,如在通知对象上,有部分股东未被通知是由于其提供的地址错误等股东自身原因造成时,不应该认定为存在通知程序上的瑕疵。第三部分,股东大会通知程序瑕疵对股东大会决议效力的影响。本部分分别从通知期限瑕疵、通知方式瑕疵、通知对象不齐全以及通知内容不完整角度出发,分析通知程序存在这些瑕疵时股东大会决议的效力。一般来说,通知程序上的瑕疵都将引起决议被撤销。但是在部分情况下,如会议通知人未按照法律和章程规定的通知方式进行通知,但是全体股东均知晓开会事宜且未提出异议的,此时通知方式上的瑕疵并不足以影响决议的作出,决议应当被认定为是有效的。第四部分对案例进行了详细的解析,并提出了笔者对处理此类案件的意见和建议。在认定通知程序上存在瑕疵决议的效力时,不应该刻板地适用公司法,而是应该对案件进行综合考察,平衡各方利益,作出最合理的判断。
[Abstract]:The general meeting of shareholders is the authority of the company and the place where all shareholders exercise shareholder rights and realize corporate governance. However, the general meeting of shareholders is a non-permanent organization of a company, which only exists in the form of a meeting, and only exists as an organ of the company when a major meeting of shareholders is held. Its normal operation is through the periodic general meeting of shareholders and temporary general meeting of shareholders to achieve. At this point, we need to design a series of procedures to protect shareholders to participate in the management of corporate affairs, through the shareholders' general meeting to claim rights and protect their own rights and interests. Based on the procedure of notice of shareholders' general meeting, this paper discusses the defects in the procedure of notice of shareholders' general meeting by analyzing a case, as well as the legal consequences of these defects. The full text is divided into four parts, a total of more than 17000 words, the main framework is as follows: The first part is the introduction, mainly through the introduction of a shareholder general meeting resolution revocation dispute case, analyzes the dispute focus of the case, and leads to the object of this paper. That is, the circumstances under which the notice procedure of shareholders' general meeting constitutes a defect, and the influence on the validity of the resolution of the shareholders' general meeting when the defect is constituted. The second part, the shareholders' general meeting notice the procedure flaw constitution. In this part, the author discusses a legal notification procedure to analyze the circumstances that will lead to defects in the notice procedure of the general meeting of shareholders. In general, when the notice of shareholders' general meeting is illegal or illegal, it constitutes a flaw in the notice procedure. However, there are exceptions. For example, when some shareholders fail to be notified because of the wrong address provided by them, they should not be regarded as defective in the notification procedure. The third part, the influence of the defect of shareholders' general meeting notice procedure on the validity of shareholders' general meeting resolution. This part analyzes the validity of the resolution of the shareholders' general meeting when the notice procedure exists from the point of view of the defect of the notice period, the defect of the way of notice, the incomplete object of notice and the incomplete content of the notice. Generally speaking, defects in the notification procedure will cause the resolution to be rescinded. But in some cases, if the notifier of the meeting fails to give notice in accordance with the means of notice prescribed by law and articles of association, but all shareholders are aware of the matter of the meeting and have not raised any objection, The defects in the method of notification are not enough to affect the making of the resolution, which should be considered as valid. The fourth part makes a detailed analysis of the case, and puts forward the author's opinions and suggestions on how to deal with such cases. In determining the validity of the defective resolution in the notice procedure, the company law should not be rigidly applied, but the case should be comprehensively investigated, the interests of all parties should be balanced, and the most reasonable judgment should be made.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】