中乌公司法比较研究

发布时间：2018-05-28 19:13

本文选题：公司法 + 公司治理制度　；参考：《天津大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：在经济全球化的背景下，中国与乌克兰在经济、文化、技术等方面的交流与合作越来越频繁和紧密，，透析中、乌两国的公司法律制度是很有益。中国和乌克兰都处在经济转型时期，公司制度都已经建立，但是也都存在不完善的地方。研究中国和乌克兰的公司法制度有助于两国公司法制度的共同发展，使两国公司法制度相互借鉴、相互学习。以期完善相关公司法制度，更好的保护大小股东的合法权益，维护市场经济的正常运行秩序。本文根据中国和乌克兰公司法的变化发展史，分析两国经济发展的异同点。对比中乌两国的公司法，从公司种类、公司设立标准、公司变更、上市公司标准和公司治理结构五个方面进行阐述：（1）归纳不同的分类标准下两国的公司种类。（2）从注册资金、注册方式、注册资本的缴纳形式和缴纳时间对比两国的公司设立标准。（3）两国公司法对公司的合并与分立、组织形式的变更、注册资本的增加与减少等的规定。（4）对比两国的股份公司上市标准。（5）比较两国的公司治理机构以及各机构职能的异同点。在上述基础上，分析两国公司法分别存在的不足并提出修改重点。
[Abstract]:In the context of economic globalization, the exchanges and cooperation between China and Ukraine in economic, cultural and technical aspects are becoming more and more frequent and close. In dialysis, the legal system of the two countries is very beneficial.
Both China and Ukraine are in the period of economic transformation, the company system has been established, but there are also imperfect places. The study of the company law system in China and Ukraine will help the common development of the company law system between the two countries, and make the legal system of the two countries learn from each other and learn from each other. The legitimate rights and interests of large and small shareholders and maintaining the normal operation order of the market economy.
Based on the history of the change and development history of China and Ukraine company law, this paper analyzes the similarities and differences between the two countries' economic development, and compares the corporate law of the two countries in five aspects: the type of the company, the standard of the company, the change of the company, the standard of the listed company and the corporate governance structure. (1) the classification of the two countries under the different classification standards. (2) From the registered capital, the way of registration, the form of the payment of the registered capital and the payment time to compare the standards for the establishment of the two countries. (3) the regulations on the merger and separation of the companies, the changes in the form of the organization, the increase and reduction of the registered capital. (4) compare the listed standards of the shares of the two countries. (5) compare the corporate governance institutions of the two countries And the similarities and differences of the functions of each institution. Based on the above analysis, the shortcomings of the two companies' laws are analyzed and the key points for revision are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：天津大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91;D951.13

【共引文献】