股份有限公司类别股东制度研究
发布时间:2018-06-08 12:45
本文选题:类别股东 + 自益权 ; 参考:《福建师范大学》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:股份公司是证券市场存在的基础,公司的治理质量在一定程度上决定了整个证券市场的发展状况。衡量公司治理质量的一个重要标准就是各类股东的权益是否得到充分保障。我国的《公司法》没有对类别股东制度做出明确规定,但是类别股份的存在是客观实际。流通股股东等各种类别股东合法正当的权益保护及其权利和义务的平衡是当前我国股份公司治理中的一个难题。本文的研究对象类别股东的权利和义务,正是为解决这一难题提供良策的。 本文拟从保护股东权益角度,尤其是从保护中小股东权益的角度出发,对我国股份有限公司引入类别股东制度相关问题进行探讨,并研究在现有的法律体制下如何进一步构建和完善系统有效的类别股东制度。制度的核心所在无非主体、权利和义务。从类别股份和类别股东的界定入手,探讨了各类别股东在自益权和共益权的享有内容和行使方式上的异同,义务履行上法律的不同规定,找出我国立法的缺失,参酌国外先进的立法例,以期对我国类别股东制度的立法设计提出进一步的思路。
[Abstract]:The stock company is the foundation of the stock market, and the quality of corporate governance determines the development of the whole securities market to a certain extent. An important standard to measure the quality of corporate governance is whether the rights and interests of all kinds of shareholders are fully protected. The company law of our country does not make clear stipulation to the system of class stockholder, but the existence of class stock is objective reality. The legal and legitimate protection of the rights and interests and the balance of rights and obligations of various kinds of shareholders such as shareholders of circulating shares are a difficult problem in the governance of joint-stock companies in our country at present. The research object of this paper is the rights and obligations of shareholders, which is the solution to this problem. This paper intends to protect the rights and interests of shareholders, especially from the perspective of protecting the rights and interests of minority shareholders. This paper probes into the problems related to the introduction of the category shareholder system into the stock limited company of our country, and studies how to further construct and perfect the systematic and effective class shareholder system under the existing legal system. The core of the system is nothing more than the subject, rights and obligations. Starting with the definition of class shares and class shareholders, this paper probes into the similarities and differences in the contents and ways of the enjoyment and exercise of the right of self-interest and the right of mutual benefit of various categories of shareholders, the different provisions of the law on the performance of the obligation, and finds out the lack of legislation in our country. Taking into account the foreign advanced legislative examples, the author hopes to put forward further thoughts on the legislative design of China's class shareholder system.
【学位授予单位】:福建师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 祝涛;;类别股东表决制度刍探[J];财会月刊;2007年03期
2 李慧;;对股利分配请求权保护制度的探析——主要以有限责任有公司为研究对象[J];研究生法学;2010年02期
3 张东;李斌;;类别股东表决制的局限性及其克服[J];法制与社会;2008年28期
4 王东光;;论新股优先认购权及其排除[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2008年05期
5 韩灵丽;论类别股东制度的建立[J];河北法学;2005年01期
6 刘大洪;张晓明;蒋银华;;类别股东表决制度研究[J];华南理工大学学报(社会科学版);2005年06期
7 辛岩;;西方国家上市公司股利政策的启示[J];合作经济与科技;2009年03期
8 刘娜;我国类别股东表决制度的设计[J];经济纵横;2005年04期
9 蒋雪雁;;英国类别股份制度研究(上)[J];金融法苑;2006年02期
10 蒋雪雁;;英国类别股份制度研究(下)[J];金融法苑;2006年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 尹丹;类别股东大会制度的法律问题研究[D];中国政法大学;2006年
2 郦晶;类别表决制度研究[D];首都经济贸易大学;2008年
,本文编号:1995838
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/1995838.html