公司小股东利益保护之强制盈余分配之诉研究
发布时间：2019-03-16 13:08
【摘要】：盈余分配是股东投资公司的目的之一。尤其对于不掌握公司实权的小股东而言,盈余分配几乎是他们获得投资回报的唯一途径。根据《公司法》的相关规定,公司分配盈余除了需具备盈余分配的条件外,还必须经股东会决议。换言之,股东会不作出盈余分配决议,股东的盈余分配权仅为一种期待权,无法落实。实践中,公司的大股东控制股东会,在公司具备盈余分配的条件时,过分提取任意公积金,或担任公司高管,通过股东会决议向公司高管发放高额奖金的形式中饱私囊,致小股东利益受损。同时,盈余分配作为公司的日常决策,法院通常采取不干涉的态度,这也导致小股东求诉无门。笔者认为,为了保护小股东的盈余分配权,公权力应当对公司是否分配盈余给予适当的干预。赋予小股东强制盈余分配诉权,是最有效的方式。本文将从强制盈余分配之诉产生的原因、存在的价值、诉讼性质、目前的司法实践、引入强制盈余分配之诉的现实可行性、具体运用中的程序问题及法院处理方式入手,探索切实有效的保护小股东盈余分配权的方法。
[Abstract]:Earnings allocation is one of the objectives of shareholder investment companies. Especially for minority shareholders who don't have real power, earnings allocation is almost the only way to get a return on investment. In accordance with the relevant provisions of the Company Law, the company must not only have the necessary conditions for the allocation of earnings, but also must be decided by the shareholders' meeting. In other words, shareholders will not make a resolution on the allocation of earnings, shareholders' right to allocate earnings is only a right of expectation, and cannot be implemented. In practice, the company's major shareholders control shareholders' meeting, when the company has the conditions to allocate earnings, excessive withdrawal of arbitrary provident funds, or acting as executives of the company, through the shareholders' meeting resolution to pay high bonuses to the company executives in the form of rich private pockets. Damage to the interests of minority shareholders. At the same time, as a daily decision-making of a company, the court usually takes a non-interference attitude, which also leads to a lack of access to appeal to minority shareholders. The author believes that in order to protect the minority shareholders' right to allocate earnings, the public power should intervene properly whether the company distributes the earnings or not. It is the most effective way to entrust the minority shareholders with the right of compulsory surplus distribution. This article will start with the causes, the value, the nature of litigation, the current judicial practice, the practical feasibility of introducing the litigation of compulsory surplus distribution, the procedural problems in the concrete application and the way of court handling. Explore effective ways to protect minority shareholders' right to allocate earnings.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
本文编号：2441423
[Abstract]:Earnings allocation is one of the objectives of shareholder investment companies. Especially for minority shareholders who don't have real power, earnings allocation is almost the only way to get a return on investment. In accordance with the relevant provisions of the Company Law, the company must not only have the necessary conditions for the allocation of earnings, but also must be decided by the shareholders' meeting. In other words, shareholders will not make a resolution on the allocation of earnings, shareholders' right to allocate earnings is only a right of expectation, and cannot be implemented. In practice, the company's major shareholders control shareholders' meeting, when the company has the conditions to allocate earnings, excessive withdrawal of arbitrary provident funds, or acting as executives of the company, through the shareholders' meeting resolution to pay high bonuses to the company executives in the form of rich private pockets. Damage to the interests of minority shareholders. At the same time, as a daily decision-making of a company, the court usually takes a non-interference attitude, which also leads to a lack of access to appeal to minority shareholders. The author believes that in order to protect the minority shareholders' right to allocate earnings, the public power should intervene properly whether the company distributes the earnings or not. It is the most effective way to entrust the minority shareholders with the right of compulsory surplus distribution. This article will start with the causes, the value, the nature of litigation, the current judicial practice, the practical feasibility of introducing the litigation of compulsory surplus distribution, the procedural problems in the concrete application and the way of court handling. Explore effective ways to protect minority shareholders' right to allocate earnings.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 甘培忠;有限责任公司小股东利益保护的法学思考——从诉讼视角考察[J];法商研究;2002年06期
2 贾林青;;论法国公司法关于防止股东滥用权利制度的借鉴价值[J];法学家;2007年02期
3 邓一;;论股利分配请求权及其司法救济[J];经营管理者;2010年02期
4 李凡;;试论股利分配请求须以股东大会决议为前提——兼谈中小股东利益保护不能侵犯公司自治权[J];河南社会科学;2005年S1期
5 华小鹏;;论股利分配请求权之诉[J];河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年03期
6 郭娅丽;;完善股利分配请求权的思路[J];理论探索;2008年06期
7 陈颖;;股东利润分配请求权纠纷之司法裁判困境与出路[J];人民司法;2009年01期
8 国鹏;;谈有限公司股东的利润分配请求权——从一起案件谈起[J];商场现代化;2006年33期
9 张辉;;公司股东股利分配请求权的思考[J];商业经济与管理;2007年05期
10 惠彬蔚;;论有限责任公司中小股东股利分配请求权的保护[J];现代经济(现代物业下半月刊);2009年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 包如源;股东盈余分配权的司法救济与立法完善[D];内蒙古大学;2009年
2 云闯;有限责任公司股东盈余分配权利的法律保障与救济[D];中国政法大学;2010年
，本文编号：2441423
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2441423.html
