多层次纠纷解决条款的性质和执行力问题研究

发布时间：2018-01-11 16:32

本文关键词：多层次纠纷解决条款的性质和执行力问题研究　出处：《华东政法大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着经济全球化的日益加深，，国际商事交往活动也变得更加频繁。在复杂的国际商事活动中，双方当事人不可避免地会产生价值或利益的冲突,因此在合同中事先规定适合的纠纷解决条款来解决未来合同履行中可能产生的纠纷是十分必要的。多层次纠纷解决条款是一种特殊的纠纷解决条款，该条款通过递进的不同的纠纷解决方式来解决纠纷:调解、和解等争议解决方式通常作为前置程序，而仲裁则作为最终的争议解决方式。该条款在替代性纠纷解决机制的基础上发展起来，并在国际商事仲裁中受到越来越广泛的关注和适用。本文旨在对多层次纠纷解决条款在实践中所涉及的主要法律问题进行分析和阐述，并对当今中国多元化纠纷解决机制的实践进行分析并提出建议。这些主要法律问题包括：多层次纠纷解决条款的性质、仲裁前置条款与仲裁条款的关系、是否履行仲裁前置义务的判断标准和主体、违反仲裁前置仲裁条款对仲裁庭管辖权的影响以及多层次纠纷解决条款的执行力等问题。由于各国对于多层次纠纷解决条款的相关问题都没有明确法律规定，笔者在本文中通过对各国实践和典型案例的分析，梳理出各国在对待以上法律问题时的态度和例行做法,并进行了深入地分析和阐述:即在义务性条款的前提下，仲裁前置条款是启动仲裁的程序性要件，只有在双方完成履行了前置义务时，仲裁程序才可以启动。但双方达成一致同意越过前置程序直接将争议交由仲裁或双方在仲裁程序中未提出相关抗辩时，仲裁庭仍然享有管辖权；关于仲裁前置条款的执行力和判断标准问题，各国均未有明文的法律规定，但随着替代性纠纷解决机制的蓬勃发展，各国在实践中都倾向于承认其执行力，但前提是该仲裁前置条款的规定足够明确以保证在执行中不产生歧义。除此之外，笔者结合对中国案例和多元化纠纷解决实践的阐述和分析，对多层次纠纷解决条款在中国的适用给出若干建议。即双方当事人在订立多层次纠纷解决条款时应当尽量明确双方当事人的义务、各个程序的起始时间点、各个阶段所适用的程序性规则等，以保证其在执行过程中足够明确且不产生歧义。同时，我国法院在对多层次纠纷解决条款等替代性纠纷解决机制的问题应当秉持更为开放的态度，鼓励其作为诉讼程序的有力补充，以通过最适合的方式帮助当时人解决纠纷，进而不断完善我国多元化纠纷解决机制的建设和发展。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of economic globalization, international commercial exchanges have become more frequent. In the complex international commercial activities, the conflict parties will inevitably produce value or interest, so in the contract provisions to settle disputes in advance is necessary to solve the possible future contract disputes.
The multi-level dispute resolution clause is a clause to solve a special dispute, the provisions to resolve the dispute through progressive different ways of solving disputes, mediation, reconciliation and other dispute solution is usually used as pre procedure, and arbitration as the ultimate way to resolve the dispute. The terms of development mechanism on the basis of the dispute. And more and more widely used in international commercial arbitration.
This paper aims at the main legal problems of the terms involved in practice to solve the multi-level dispute analysis and elaboration, and today's Chinese diversified dispute settlement mechanism in practice are analyzed and suggestions are put forward. These include the main legal problems: in terms of nature to solve the multi-level relationship disputes, arbitration clause and arbitration clause, whether to perform judgment the standard arbitration obligations and the main problems in terms of execution to solve the violation of pre arbitration arbitration clause to the jurisdiction of the arbitration tribunal and multi-level dispute.
Because of issues related to countries for multi-level dispute resolution provisions are not clear legal provisions, analysis of the practice and typical cases by the author in this paper, sort out the attitudes of the countries in dealing with the above legal issues and routine practice, and in-depth analysis and elaboration: in the premise of obligations under the terms of the. Arbitration clause is to start the arbitration procedural requirements, only in both pre fulfilled the obligations, the arbitration procedure can be started. But the two sides agreed over the preceding procedure directly to the dispute by arbitration in the arbitration proceedings or both parties did not put forward relevant defense, the arbitration tribunal still has jurisdiction; standard execution problems and judgment about the arbitration clause, legal provisions are not clear, but with the rapid development of alternative dispute resolution mechanism, all countries incline in practice To acknowledge its execution, but the premise is that the provisions of the pre arbitration clause are sufficiently clear to ensure that there is no ambiguity in the execution.
In addition, the author describes and analyses the practice of solving Chinese case and diversified disputes, some suggestions are given to solve the applicable clause in the China of multi-level dispute. Both parties in a multi-level dispute resolution clause should try to clear the duties of both parties, starting time of each program, apply to all stages of the procedural rules, to ensure that in the process of implementation is not clear enough and ambiguity. At the same time, the Chinese court should uphold the more open attitude in the multi-level dispute resolution clause of alternative dispute resolution mechanism, encourage it as a powerful supplement to the proceedings, to the most appropriate way to help at the time people solve disputes, and constantly improve the diversification of China's dispute settlement mechanism construction and development.

【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D996

【参考文献】