选择法院协议的排他性问题研究

发布时间：2018-01-16 08:31

本文关键词：选择法院协议的排他性问题研究　出处：《华东政法大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：选择法院协议的排他性问题在理论界受到重视的被研究地位也愈来愈高,穷根究底源于当事人合意选择法院是解决管辖权冲突的重要手段。从目前各国法律、理论和实践来看,普遍允许当事人选择法院已经成为屡见不鲜的事实,但是在选择法院的排他性问题上有些国家就显现出大相径庭的一面。2005年海牙《选择法院协议公约》是历久弥坚而形成的,在协议管辖领域中国际上声望不逊于且有希望与《纽约公约》比肩的专门性国际公约,它系统全面的协议管辖规则是一大亮点,该公约所蕴含的有关协议管辖的立法精神和成果是值得各个国家加以学习和借鉴的,它在2015年10月开始生效,为国际民商事管辖权的统一进程添砖加瓦。而我国目前立法对法院选择协议的排他性标准未作规定,在司法实践中有些法院的解释也层次不齐,完善我国在这方面单薄的立法规定必然在实践中添加助益。本文通过对判断选择法院协议的排他性的标准、限制选择法院协议排他性的因素进行研究,层层深入分析从而评估我国加入海牙《选择法院协议公约》的可行性,希望为我国在选择法院协议排他性的立法方面的完善略施助益。文章主体分为四部分:第一部分概述选择法院协议的相关内容。一方面从选择法院协议的概念与发展历程进行阐述,引出选择法院协议的排他性内容。第二个方面详述选择法院协议排他性的效力问题,最后,讲述2005年海牙《选择法院协议》关于选择法院协议的排他性规则。第二部分论述判断法院选择协议的排他性标准。首先是选择法院协议的准据法问题,阐述了目前国际上有关选择法院协议法律适用的几种主要理论观点,并提出了自己的见解。其次是美国的许可性-排他性标准,用案例进行剖析。再次是我国在司法实践中是如何对选择法院协议是否排他进行判断的,用案例进行分析,并提出了笔者的观点。第三部分是对限制选择法院协议排他性的因素作了阐述。这些限制性因素包括公共秩序保留原则、专属管辖权、不方便法院原则以及实际联系原则。第四部分分析我国在选择法院协议的排他性问题上的立法及前景,首先从我国协议管辖制度和选择法院协议排他性问题的立法现状的阐述出发,包括我国2012年修订的《民事诉讼法》中关于选择法院协议的相关规则,及与海牙《选择法院协议公约》相关规则的比较,其次是阐述我国批准海牙公约是否可行,有哪些障碍,以及对策和建议。
[Abstract]:The problem of exclusive choice of court agreements valued by more and more research status in the theoretical circle, get to the bottom of the source in the choice of court agreement of the parties is an important means to solve the conflict of jurisdiction. From the current law, theory and practice, the court generally allowed to choose has become the fact but in the exclusive It is often seen.. The problem on the choice of court in some countries appear to be quite different side of.2005 in Hague "Convention on choice of court agreements > is enduring formed, under the jurisdiction of the agreement in the field of international prestige as well as on and hope and" New York convention > par special international convention, it is systematic and comprehensive agreement jurisdiction rules is one of the highlights and the spirit of legislation and achievements about the agreement contained in the Convention under the jurisdiction of various countries is worthy of study and reference, which took effect in October 2015, as The unified process of international civil jurisdiction blocks. But China's current legislation on the exclusive choice of court agreement standard is not specified in the judicial practice, some courts also explain uneven levels, improve China's weak legislation in this regard must be added in practice. Based on the judgment of the choice of court agreement exclusive criteria, factors of the exclusive choice of court agreement, layers of in-depth analysis to assess the feasibility of "Hague Convention on choice of court agreements on China's accession to the hope for our country in the legislative choice of court agreement exclusive of a perfect benefit. This article is divided into four parts: the first part is an overview about the relevant content of choice court agreement. On the one hand from the concept and development of choice of court agreement on lead content exclusive choice of court agreement. The following second aspects: The effectiveness of choice of court agreement exclusive, finally, about 2005 Hague's choice of court agreement > about exclusive choice of court agreement. The second part discusses the rules of judgment standard of exclusive choice of court agreement. The first is the applicable law of choice of court agreement, expounded on the choice of court agreement law applicable to several major theoretical perspectives on the current international, and put forward their own opinions. Second is the United States exclusive licensing standards, use case analysis. Once again, in the judicial practice of our country is how to choice of court agreement whether the exclusive judgment, analyzed by case, and put forward the author's point of view. The third part is the factors to limit the choice of court the exclusive agreement is introduced. These restrictive factors include the principle of reservation of public order, exclusive jurisdiction, inconvenient court principle and the actual contact with the original Then the fourth part analysis of legislation and the prospect of China in the exclusive choice of court agreement on the issue, first of all from the legislation jurisdiction and exclusive choice of court agreement our protocol based on relevant rules, including the choice of court agreement of the civil procedural law of China revised in 2012 < >, the comparison and selection of the court the relevant rules and the Hague agreement > <, second is expounded China's approval of the Hague convention is feasible, what are the obstacles and countermeasures and suggestions.

【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D997

【相似文献】