国际岛争中的说理致胜之道——钓鱼岛问题的历史与国际法透视

发布时间：2018-01-18 13:22

本文关键词：国际岛争中的说理致胜之道——钓鱼岛问题的历史与国际法透视　出处：《人民论坛·学术前沿》2014年13期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：中日钓鱼岛之争并非日本与邻国间唯一的纠纷,如此的逢有邻国必有领域纠纷之现象绝非巧合:一方面日本局限于四个小岛,故自古以来即有向外扩张之压力;另一方面这也是美国战后为维护其在东亚的霸权地位蓄意安排的结果。在中日钓鱼岛之争执过程中,日本常用似是而非的手法企图栽赃中方以图巩固自身立场。与中国对钓鱼岛主权的依据相比,绝对相形见绌。中国在国际上与日本争论钓鱼岛主权问题,习惯套用历史之根据,胜过引用国际法的依据。实际上,国际法与相关史实绝对站在中国一边,中方也不能再用"以后再说"的思维来处理问题,一定要做到说理透彻,特别须要依照国际法据理力争。
[Abstract]:The dispute over the Diaoyu Islands between China and Japan is not the only dispute between Japan and its neighboring countries. It is no coincidence that there is bound to be a dispute in the field between Japan and its neighbors: on the one hand, Japan is confined to four islands, so it has been under pressure to expand outwards since ancient times; On the other hand, this was also the result of the deliberate arrangement of the United States in order to safeguard its hegemony in East Asia after the war, and during the dispute between China and Japan in the Diaoyu Islands. Japan used specious tactics to try to plant China to consolidate its position. Compared with the basis of China's sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands, absolutely dwarfed. China and Japan in the international dispute over the sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands. In fact, international law and relevant historical facts absolutely side with China, and China can no longer use the "later" thinking to deal with problems. We must be thorough, especially in accordance with international law.
【作者单位】：美国纽约大学政治学系;
【分类号】：D993
【正文快照】： 导言:日本与邻国领土纠纷之由来中日钓鱼岛之争,并不是日本与邻国间唯一的纠纷。环观日本四周,北面有与俄罗斯的南千岛群岛(日本称北方四岛)之争,西边与韩国有独岛(竹岛)之纠缠,西南方与中国有钓鱼岛(尖阁群岛)之争执。亏得日本东面没有邻国只是海洋,要不然,恐怕也会有领土(岛

【相似文献】