反倾销中公共利益制度研究

发布时间：2018-01-22 10:27

本文关键词： 公共利益反倾销立法利害关系方　出处：《安徽大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着国际经济贸易的深度发展,反倾销贸易形势也是愈演愈烈,无论是作为反倾销的主动方还是被动方,我国都备受瞩目。反倾销措施的本意是维护公平贸易,但它似乎与贸易保护主义天然相关,二者就好比数轴的正负两端,过了界就会相互转化,正好就需要一个零点作为平衡点来调节二者的矛盾,而公共利益原则可以恰如其分的扮演好这个角色,因此原本社会学中的公共利益原则就被引入到了法学中,在国际贸易的反倾销制度中广为应用。公共利益的概念虽然至今仍没有明确的定义,但关键是把握公共利益原则与相关要素的关系,厘清这些关系有助于理解公共利益条款中利害关系方的关系。公共利益的理解可以从多个角度,笔者从理论角度与实践角度进行了分析,理论角度主要是进行了法理学分析,重在论证反倾销立法中引入公共利益原则的意义。公共利益原则的实践意义更是重要,它是国际贸易竞争的均衡器,能够很好地弥补反倾销措施的局限性,典型案例就是双酚A案与中欧光伏产品案例,通过这个案例能够很好的感受到现代贸易合作的本质就是以公共利益为视角,互利共赢,而不是囚徒困境,你死我活。最早将公共利益原则引入立法并付诸实践的是加拿大。虽然加拿大并未对"公共利益"作出明确的界定,但法律条文对参与公共利益调查的各利害关系方以及裁判庭在调查中应考虑的因素作出了明文规定,这是值得借鉴的地方。加拿大的"婴儿产品案"就是运用公共利益的典型。其次比较有特色的是欧盟的反倾销立法,欧盟更加注重对利害关系人程序性权利的保护,而且还严格规定了相关主管机构保护利害关系人的义务。欧盟的"硅铁反倾销案"也是很典型的。WTO《反倾销协订》中的相关条款也是有得有失。我国作为WTO的重要成员方,2004年也修改了反倾销立法,正式引入了公共利益制度。随着我国作为贸易大国的崛起,现行立法中的该制度已经远远不能适应现实的需要,相关程序立法与实体立法方面都存在着诸多缺陷。为完善反倾销立法,应该从实体和程序立法两方面入手,尤其要注重相关利害关系方的各种权利,适当扩大利害关系方的范围,健全相关利益平衡机制,确保立法的衔接与配套。我国反倾销公共利益制度的实践也是喜忧参半,既有像双酚A案这样的成功案例,也有像光伏产业案这样不如意的案例。为完善反倾销公共利益制度的实践,我们应当在反倾销案中善于考量利益,加强与其他利害关系主体的联系与合作,积极参加国际谈判,最重要的是提高企业自身的竞争力。这才是应对国际反倾销,维护我国公共利益最有力的武器。当然,我们也应借鉴加拿大、欧盟相关立法与实践经验,结合实际,变为己用。在维护我国贸易利益的情况下,更好地推动国际贸易的健康发展。本文结合了多种分析方法,有法理学分析、案例实证分析分析,使得文章有理论有实践,不再那么枯燥。鉴于笔者的学识能力有限,没能得出一些创新性的见解,但依然希望能为我国的反倾销立法提供一些独到的见解。
[Abstract]:With the depth of the development of international economy and trade, anti-dumping trade situation is intensified, either as active or passive anti-dumping, China's anti-dumping measures have attracted much attention. The intention is to maintain fair trade, but it seems to be natural and trade protectionism, the two is the axis of the positive and negative ends, too community will be transformed into each other, just need a contradiction between zero as the balancing point to adjust the two, and the principle of public interests can play this role to a proper extent, so that the sociology of public interest principle was introduced to the law in international trade, anti-dumping system widely used in public. Although interest is still not clearly defined, but the key is to grasp the relationship between public interest principle and the related factors, to clarify these relations can help to understand the public interest in terms of the relationship of interest The relationship between the public interest. Can be understood from many angles, the author analyzes from the angle of theory and practice, theory is mainly the analysis of jurisprudence, focuses on the demonstration of anti-dumping legislation in the introduction of the principle of public interest. The public interest principle in practical significance is more important, it is the equalizer of international trade competition that is able to make up the limitations of the anti-dumping measures, the typical case is bisphenol A case and EU photovoltaic products through the case, this case can be very good to feel the essence of modern trade cooperation is mutually beneficial to the public interest perspective, instead of the prisoner's dilemma. The first fight at outrance public interest principle the introduction of the legislation and practice of Canada is Canada. Although not on the "public interest" clearly defined, but the legal provisions of the public interest involved in the investigation and the relationship And the factors that should be considered in the investigation of the tribunal made expressly, this is a worthwhile place. Typical Canada "baby products case" is the use of public interests. Secondly the more distinctive is the EU anti-dumping laws, the European Union pays more attention to the protection of procedural rights of the interested parties, but also strict rules the relevant authorities to protect the interested party's obligations. The EU's "ferrosilicon anti-dumping case" is representative of the.WTO< anti dumping agreement terms > is mixed. In China as an important member of WTO, 2004 Revision of the anti-dumping legislation, formally introduced the public interest system with China's rise. As a trading power, in the current legislation of the system cannot adapt to the needs of the reality, relevant legislation and legislation there are many defects. In order to improve the anti dumping legislation, We should start from the two aspects of substantive and procedural legislation, with particular emphasis on the rights of the relevant stakeholders, and expand the scope of the interested parties, improve the relevant interests balance mechanism to ensure convergence and supporting legislation. The practice of China's anti-dumping public interest system is mixed, both success stories such as bisphenol A case also, there are unsatisfactory cases such as photovoltaic industry case. In order to improve the practice of anti-dumping public interest system, we should be good at the interests in anti-dumping cases, and strengthen the contact with other interested subjects, actively participate in international negotiations, the most important is to improve the competitiveness of enterprises. This is to deal with the international anti-dumping, safeguard the public interests of China's most powerful weapons. Of course, we should also learn from Canada, the European Union legislation and practice experience, combined with the actual change in the maintenance of me for their own use. China's trade interests, to better promote the healthy development of international trade. This paper combined various analysis methods, a jurisprudential analysis, case analysis, makes the article have theory and practice, is no longer so boring. In view of the author's limited knowledge and ability, can't get some innovative ideas, but still hope to to provide some insights into China's anti-dumping legislation.

【学位授予单位】：安徽大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D996.1

【相似文献】