论WTO框架下的司法能动主义

发布时间：2018-01-25 08:41

本文关键词： WTO 争端解决机制司法能动主义　出处：《山东大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：自世界贸易组织(WTO)取代1944年得关税与贸易总协定(GATT)起,乌拉圭回合谈判所取得的最重要的成果之一就是WTO争端解决机制。截止至2011年2月10日,受WTO争端解决机制约束的成员方有153个,WTO争端解决机制己成为当前国际贸易争端解决最有影响力的机制。在WTO争端解决机制中,专家组、上诉机构只能对WTO协定的模糊之处进行澄清,但它们并没有被授权填补WTO协定中存在的漏洞和空缺。然而,近些年来上诉机构的一些裁决所表现出来的司法能动主义倾向引发了WTO成员方和学者们的担忧和批评,因此对其进行界定、分析司法能动主义产生的法理根源及表现、以及明确如何应对司法能动主义尤显必要。本文分为绪论、正文和结语三大部分,其中正文有六章。在绪论部分,作者主要交代论文的研究背景、研究对象以及研究意义。第一章对司法能动主义概念进行阐述,追溯了它的历史渊源,并与司法克制主义进行比较进一步。第二章界定WTO争端解决机制中的司法能动主义的涵义,以及WTO中司法解释哲学。第三章主要探讨司法能动主义在WTO争端解决机制中的表现---法庭之友制度。列举了美国海虾-海龟案、欧共体石棉瓦案、英国热轧铅铋碳钢产品反补贴案3个实例,阐述“法庭之友”在WTO争端解决机制中的发展及其价值。第四章是对司法能动主义的法理研究,主要探讨了WTO争端解决机制的司法独立性、WTO司法解释应遵循的解释规则、以及WTO司法能动主义产生的原因。第五章分析WTO司法能动主义扩张的限制因素及其扩张的局限性。第六章指出WTO司法能动主义的危害,并提出中国应对WTO司法能动主义的途径。作者号召专家组、上诉机构、成员方共同努力,为实现WTO司法克制贡献自己的一份力量。
[Abstract]:Since the World Trade Organization (WTO) replaced the General Agreement on tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1944. One of the most important results of the Uruguay Round of negotiations is the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. As of February 10th 2011, 153 members have been bound by the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. The WTO dispute settlement mechanism has become the most influential mechanism of international trade dispute settlement. In the WTO dispute settlement mechanism, the panel of experts and the appellate body can only clarify the ambiguity of the WTO agreement. But they are not authorized to fill the gaps and gaps in the WTO agreement. In recent years, the judicial activism of some decisions of appellate bodies has aroused the concern and criticism of WTO members and scholars, so it is defined. It is necessary to analyze the legal origin and manifestation of judicial activism and how to deal with it. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which there are six chapters. In the introduction part, the author mainly explains the research background, research object and research significance. The first chapter expounds the concept of judicial activism, traces its historical origin, and compares it with judicial restraint. The second chapter defines the meaning of judicial activism in WTO dispute settlement mechanism and the philosophy of judicial interpretation in WTO. The third chapter mainly discusses the performance of judicial activism in the WTO dispute settlement mechanism-amicus curiae system. Enumerates the American shrimp-sea turtle case, the European Community asbestos tile case. This paper discusses the development and value of "amicus curiae" in the dispute settlement mechanism of WTO with three examples of anti-subsidy case of hot rolled lead bismuth carbon steel in Britain. Chapter 4th is a legal study of judicial activism. It mainly discusses the judicial independence of WTO dispute settlement mechanism and the interpretation rules it should follow. And the causes of WTO judicial activism. Chapter 5th analyzes the restrictive factors of WTO's judicial activism and the limitation of its expansion. Chapter 6th points out the harm of WTO judicial activism, and puts forward the ways for China to deal with WTO judicial activism. The author calls on the panel of experts, appellate bodies and members to make joint efforts. To achieve the WTO judicial restraint to contribute their part of the force.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.1

【参考文献】