当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 国际法论文 >

中国运用WTO争端解决机制实证研究

发布时间:2018-01-26 07:53

  本文关键词: WTO争端解决机制 申诉 应诉 策略 出处:《华东理工大学》2012年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:自2001年我国加入世贸组织至今已逾首个十年。在这十年中,中国的对外贸易飞速发展,与他国的贸易摩擦和纠纷也愈来愈多。入世后,中国开始运用WTO争端解决机制解决与他国之间的争端,逐渐积累争端解决的实战经验。在前五年的过渡期内,我国在WTO争端解决机制下的诉讼环境相对平淡。我国主要以第三方身份参与争端解决。申诉和应诉的案例都较少。过渡期后,在全球金融危机的背景下,我国参与的争端解决逐年增加。从整体来讲,由于入世时间不长,与其他成员国相比,一方面,我国的申诉活动还相对较少,申诉效果也不甚理想。另一方面,以美国、欧盟等发达国家为首的经济体频繁针对我国的各项对外贸易政策、法规等方面提出质疑和挑战。应诉的案件显著增加。但是,在争端解决过程中,诉讼结果往往不尽如人意。本文从中国参与的争端解决实际案例出发,通过深入剖析案情,找出我国胜败的原因和经验教训,从而对我国提出一些建议。便于在将来的诉讼中达到比较理想的效果。
[Abstract]:Since 2001, China has joined the WTO for more than ten years. In this decade, China's foreign trade has developed rapidly, and trade frictions and disputes with other countries have become more and more. China began to use the WTO dispute settlement mechanism to resolve disputes with other countries, gradually accumulated the actual experience of dispute settlement. During the first five years of the transition period. The litigation environment of our country under the WTO dispute settlement mechanism is relatively flat. Our country mainly participates in the dispute settlement as a third party. There are few cases of complaint and response. After the transition period, under the background of the global financial crisis. China's participation in dispute settlement is increasing year by year. On the whole, due to the short time of WTO accession, compared with other member countries, on the one hand, the appeal activities of our country are relatively less, and the appeal effect is not very good on the other hand. The economies led by developed countries such as the United States and the European Union frequently challenge and challenge China's foreign trade policies and regulations. The number of cases responding to the case has increased significantly. However, in the process of dispute settlement. Litigation results are often unsatisfactory. This article from the actual case of dispute settlement in China, through in-depth analysis of the case, to find out the reasons and lessons of China's victory and defeat. Some suggestions are put forward for our country, which is convenient to achieve the ideal effect in the future litigation.
【学位授予单位】:华东理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D996.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前9条

1 申琳;简析WTO《保障措施协议》救济措施的缺陷[J];安阳师范学院学报;2004年03期

2 陈喜峰,虞汪日;论WTO案例中的司法经济原则[J];福建政法管理干部学院学报;2002年04期

3 都亳;我国对WTO争端解决机制的应对策略[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;2001年03期

4 杨荣珍;从WTO案例看如何理解“国内税的国民待遇”[J];税务研究;2003年11期

5 唐青阳;WTO规则的法解释学初探[J];现代法学;2003年05期

6 赵维田;WTO案例研究:1998年海龟案[J];环球法律评论;2001年02期

7 郭薇,翁杰;从权力导向型向规则导向型的嬗变——试析GATT/WTO争端解决机制的演进和整合[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社科版);2005年08期

8 田青;对WTO争端解决机制的评价及其启示[J];浙江工程学院学报;2002年04期

9 陈志超;WTO《反倾销协议》新问题的思考──欧共体床单案的启示[J];中国对外贸易;2001年12期



本文编号:1465102

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1465102.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户0a7e9***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com