理性人标准在知识产权法中的规范性适用

发布时间：2018-01-28 22:13

  本文关键词： 理性人标准 知识产权法 规范性 客观化　出处：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：商标法中的"相关公众"、专利法中的"本领域普通技术人员"及版权法实践中的"普通观察者或听众"等拟制人格与传统法律上的"理性人"概念在构成和功能上无实质性差异,在学理和实践中经常被视为知识产权法语境下之"理性人"。分散于知识产权法不同领域中的理性人标准具有极多共性成分,"公因式"的提取可以为其适用提供更为简便和协调的路径。理性人标准适用于客体适格性确定、侵权判定及权利解释等知识产权法领域。在对知识产权法中理性人进行拟制时,应考虑所属群体范围、认知水平及时间选择等要素。知识产权政策目标定位和围绕着知识产品的"物化"环境两个因素影响着知识产权法中理性人标准的确定。实际判断者与理性人之间认知偏差的矫正以及理性人标准的类型化是解决我国知识产权法中理性人标准"客观化"障碍的主要路径。
[Abstract]:The "relevant public" in trademark law. There is no substantial difference in constitution and function between the fictitious personality such as "ordinary technician in this field" and "ordinary observer or audience" in the practice of copyright law and the concept of "rational person" in traditional law. In theory and practice, it is often regarded as "rational person" in the context of intellectual property law. The standard of rational person scattered in different fields of intellectual property law has many common elements. The extraction of "common factor" can provide a more convenient and coordinated path for its application. The standard of rational person is applicable to the determination of object suitability. In the field of intellectual property law, such as tort judgment and interpretation of rights, the scope of the group should be considered when the rational person in intellectual property law is fictitious. Factors such as cognitive level and time choice. Orientation of intellectual property policy objectives and materialization around knowledge products. Two factors of environment affect the determination of the standard of rational person in intellectual property law. The correction of cognitive deviation between the practical judge and the rational person and the classification of the standard of rational person are the solutions to the standard of rational person in intellectual property law of our country. Objective "the main path of obstacles."
【作者单位】： 郑州大学法学院;
【基金】：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目(16SFB2034)“理性人标准在我国知识产权法中的规范性适用研究”
【分类号】：D997
【正文快照】： 一、问题的提出 法律上的理性人标准(1)起始于英美侵权法,主要用来判断行为人是否履行应有的注意义务。根据该标准,“过失产生于从事一个理性人同样情形下不会从事的行为,或者没有从事一个理性人将会从事的行为”。[1]虽然在本质和界定上存在着很大分歧(2),但理 性人标准在，

本文编号：1471689