关于菲律宾提起的“南海仲裁案”的法理分析

发布时间：2018-02-20 22:37

本文关键词： 仲裁庭海洋权益太平岛领土主权历史性权利国际法规范中国国际法学会岩礁习惯国际法历史性海湾 　出处：《中国法学》2016年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：正2016年7月12日,在中方缺席的情况下,应菲律宾阿基诺政府单方请求建立的南海仲裁案仲裁庭(以下简称"仲裁庭")就该案做出了实体问题的裁决。这是一场由某些域外国家导演的披着法律外衣的政治闹剧,其目的是损害中国在南海的领土主权和海洋权益。针对上述所谓裁决,中国政府先后发表了一系列声明和相关文件,表明了我国不参与、不接受、不承认的严正立场,并重申了中国在南海的领土主权和海洋权益。中国法学会也于2016年7月13日发表了《关于菲律宾共和国单方面提起的南海仲裁案的声明》,从法律层面有力地支持了我国政府的观点和立场。2016年7月21日,中国法学会联合中国国际法学会、中国海洋法学会共同举办了"南海仲裁案法律专家座谈会",组织国内60余位知名海洋法、国际法专家学者,对南海仲裁案严重损害中国领土主权和海洋权益的所谓裁决做进一步法律评析。专家们在座谈中指出,无论是基于《联合国海洋法公约》(以下简称《公约》)的宗旨、原则和规定、国际社会公认的基本法理,还是基于基本的历史事实,菲律宾单方面提起仲裁和仲裁庭强行推进有关程序均是违法、无效的。现将座谈会中较有代表性的专家观点以笔谈形式刊发,以期能够引领更多的相关研究。
[Abstract]:On July 12th 2016, in the absence of the Chinese side, The South China Sea Arbitration Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the "arbitral tribunal"), established at the unilateral request of the Aquino Government of the Philippines, ruled on the substantive issue of the case. It was a political farce under the guise of law directed by certain extraterritorial countries. Its purpose is to impair China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea. In response to the above-mentioned so-called ruling, the Chinese Government has successively issued a series of statements and related documents, which show that China does not participate in, accept or recognize Yan Zheng's position. In July 13th 2016, the Chinese Society of Law also issued a declaration on the arbitration case in the South China Sea unilaterally filed by the Republic of the Philippines, which was strongly supported by the Chinese Society of Law at the legal level. My Government's views and positions. July 21st 2016, The Chinese Society of Law, in conjunction with the Chinese Society of International Law and the Chinese Society of Marine Law, jointly organized the "Symposium of legal experts on Arbitration cases in the South China Sea", which organized more than 60 well-known domestic law of the sea and international law experts and scholars. Further legal evaluation of the so-called award of the arbitration case in the South China Sea that seriously damages China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests. The experts pointed out in the panel that whether it is based on the purpose of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (hereinafter referred to as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea), The principles and provisions, the fundamental jurisprudence recognized by the international community and the fact that, on the basis of basic historical facts, it is unlawful for the Philippines to unilaterally initiate arbitration and the arbitral tribunal to enforce the proceedings in question, Invalid. The more representative expert views in the symposium are published in written form, in order to lead more relevant research.
【作者单位】：中国法学会;外交部条约法律司;国际关系学院;海南大学;厦门大学南海研究院;
【基金】：中国法学会课题“我国南海岛礁所涉重大现实问题及其对策”(项目批准号:CLS(2015)ZDWT54)的阶段性成果之一
【分类号】：D993.5

【相似文献】