论WTO《反倾销协定》中的“可获得最佳信息”规则

发布时间：2018-02-25 23:23

本文关键词： WTO 反倾销调查可获得最佳信息 FANs　出处：《华东政法大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文针对WTO《反倾销协定》第6条第8款规定的“可获得最佳信息”规则和附件2中规定的该规则的适用规则进行研究。通过对美国、欧盟和加拿大等国家和地区有关“可获得最佳信息”规则的立法和实践的分析,以及对在WTO多哈回合谈判中各成员方提出的针对该规则的修改意见的详述,意在为我国企业在遭遇反倾销调查,调查机关拒绝接受我国企业提供的信息,转而适用可获得的信息时寻找应对方法。本文共分为五章: 第一章为对“可获得最佳信息”概念的阐述。通过对WTO反倾销调查中基本证据规则、机密信息披露规则等背景信息的介绍,对“可获得最佳信息”规则的功能和重要性进行了探讨,并对该规则在GATT和WTO中的发展进行了概述。第二章在《反倾销协定》第6条第8款规定的基础上逐个分析了“可获得最佳信息”规则的适用情形;并通过列举反倾销调查机关在适用“可获得最佳信息”规则时应尽的义务,体现了该规则的主旨在于规范调查机关在调查中的自由裁量权,防止权力和自由的滥用。此外,本章还包括了对《反倾销协定》中一些表述的进一步解释,例如有关利害关系方的“合作”、“尽其所能”以及“更不利的后果”等。第三章主要介绍了美国、欧盟等国家和地区对于“可获得最佳信息”规则的立法和实践。通过与《反倾销协定》中的相关规定进行对照,体现了该规则在不同国家或地区适用的特点,也引发了对“可获得最佳信息”规则进行改革的必要性的讨论。多哈回合谈判中,FANs就“可获得最佳信息”规则提出了七个改革建议。第四章的主要内容就是对这些建议的内容和谈判组对待这些建议的态度进行详细的介绍;并总结出针对该规则的最佳的改革方案就是尽快制定并通过“最佳实践”指导原则。第五章主要介绍了“可获得最佳信息”规则在中国的立法和实践。意在鼓励中国企业在遭遇反倾销调查时要积极应诉、及时提供必要信息,尽量避免外国调查机关援引“可获得最佳信息”规则进行裁决。同时提醒中国企业,要掌握该规则的主旨和适用规则,防患于未然,并充分利用政府磋商和争端解决机构的作用保护自身利益。
[Abstract]:This paper studies the application rules of " best information " and " best information " rules stipulated in Article 6 , paragraph 8 , of WTO Anti - dumping Agreement . By analyzing the legislation and practice of " best information " rules in countries and regions such as the United States , the European Union and Canada , and the amendments to the rules put forward by various members in the Doha round of WTO negotiations , it is intended that Chinese enterprises refuse to accept the information provided by our enterprises in the course of the anti - dumping investigation . In turn , the investigating authorities refuse to accept the information provided by our enterprises . This article is divided into five chapters : The first chapter introduces the concept of " best information " , discusses the function and importance of " best information " rules through the introduction of basic rules of evidence and disclosure rules of confidential information in WTO anti - dumping investigation , and summarizes the development of the rules in GATT and WTO . Chapter 2 , on the basis of article 6 , paragraph 8 , of the Anti - dumping Agreement , analyzes the application situation of " best information " rules one by one , and embodies the obligation of the anti - dumping investigation organ in the application of the " best information " rules . The purpose of the rule is to regulate the discretion of the investigation organ in the investigation , prevent the abuse of power and freedom . In addition , this chapter also includes further explanation of some of the expressions in the Anti - dumping Agreement , such as " cooperation " , " best possible " and " more adverse consequences " of the interested party . Chapter three introduces the legislation and practice of " best information " rules in countries and regions such as the United States , the European Union and so on . By comparison with the relevant provisions in the Anti - dumping Agreement , the characteristics of the rules in different countries or regions are reflected , and the discussion of the necessity of reforming the rules of " best information " is also initiated . In the Doha Round negotiations , FANs proposed seven reform proposals for the " best information " rule . The main elements of chapter IV were detailed presentations on the content of those recommendations and the manner in which the negotiating groups treated them ; and concluded that the best reform programme for the rule was to develop and adopt the principle of " best practice " as soon as possible . The fifth chapter mainly introduces the legislation and practice of " best information " rules in China . It is intended to encourage Chinese enterprises to respond positively to the anti - dumping investigation and to provide the necessary information in a timely manner , so as to avoid referring to the rules of " best information " . At the same time , remind Chinese enterprises that they should master the spirit and applicable rules of the rules , prevent them from being affected , and take full advantage of the role of government consultation and dispute settlement institutions to protect their own interests .

【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.1

【共引文献】