国际私法中知识产权纠纷管辖权研究

发布时间：2018-03-04 14:53

本文选题：知识产权　切入点：知识产权纠纷　出处：《苏州大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：众所周知,由于知识产权的地域性特征,国际私法的理论和实践领域长期坚持在没有国际公约和双边互惠协定的情况下,只有注册地法院才能对其地域范围内的知识产权纠纷进行管辖,一国法院无权对外国的知识产权案件进行管辖,由此便会造成大量的管辖权冲突。而随着知识产权国际化的不断发展,知识产权保护经历从国内到国际,从双边到多边的历程,其严格地域性特征已经随着知识产权国际协调制度的建立和发展以及各国国际私法立法的发展而逐渐弱化,甚至有所突破。随着知识产权纠纷地域管辖原则的局限性日益明显,固守该原则使得保护本国知识产权处于明显不利状态。基于该局限性,很多国家特别是在技术和贸易上处于优势地位的发达国家,在突破知识产权地域性管辖方面做了诸多尝试,产生大量丰富的实践。因此随着国际经济贸易交往的日益频繁,严格的地域性在有限的范围内逐渐弱化,由于种种原因,知识产权法也像其他民事权利立法一样具有域外效力。同时随着各国知识产权交往的频繁深入,各种知识产权纠纷也随之而起,在没有双边协定和公约的前提下,管辖权冲突不可避免,所以如何解决这种跨国管辖权冲突已成为当前理论和实践中亟待解决的问题。本文对国际上知识产权纠纷管辖权的国际私法立法和实践作出了深入的探讨,一共分为六章,前两章主要就知识产权的特性以及管辖权冲突产生的原因作出阐述,第三章对知识产权的管辖权制度进行描述。本文重点在第四章,即管辖权制度在具体知识产权案件中的运用,该章把纠纷案件分为三类:一是知识产权确权纠纷,着重讨论的知识产权的建立、效力以及所有权的管辖权问题;二是知识产权合同纠纷,着重讨论知识产权在许可和转让过程中的管辖权问题;三是知识产权的侵权纠纷,着重讨论的是知识产权遭受侵权后的管辖权问题。该章通过各国在知识产权各类案件上的实践和立法作出了深入的剖析,对其特点和缺陷作出评析,并对具体的制度设计作出了构架。第五章对知识产权管辖权制度的发展趋势作出了描述,由于各国对于知识产权管辖权制度的立法和实践带有某种趋势,这对于其精神的把握至关重要。第六章着重描述了对中国知识产权管辖权制度的现状以及对中国的具体制度构建提出具体的建议。国际上管辖权冲突的理论和实践问题必然带来随之而来的是中国的立法问题,由于中国对于知识产权纠纷管辖权方面的立法缺乏完整的体系,望本文对中国的知识产权纠纷管辖权国际私法立法有一定的借鉴作用。
[Abstract]:As we all know, due to the regional character of intellectual property rights, the theoretical and practical field of private international law has long persisted in the absence of international conventions and bilateral reciprocal agreements. Only the court in the place of registration can have jurisdiction over intellectual property disputes in its territory, and the courts of a country have no right to jurisdiction over intellectual property cases of foreign countries, which will result in a large number of conflicts of jurisdiction. With the continuous development of the internationalization of intellectual property, intellectual property protection has experienced the course from domestic to international, from bilateral to multilateral. With the establishment and development of the international coordination system of intellectual property rights and the development of the legislation of private international law, its strict regional character has gradually weakened and even made a breakthrough. As the limitations of the principle of territorial jurisdiction in intellectual property disputes become increasingly evident, adherence to the principle puts the protection of intellectual property in a state of obvious disadvantage. Many countries, especially the developed countries which have advantages in technology and trade, have made a lot of attempts to break through the regional jurisdiction of intellectual property, which has produced a great deal of rich practice. Therefore, with the increasing frequency of international economic and trade exchanges, strict regionalism is gradually weakened in a limited range, for various reasons. Intellectual property law has the same extraterritorial effect as other civil rights legislation. Meanwhile, with the frequent deepening of intellectual property exchanges in various countries, various intellectual property disputes also arise. Without bilateral agreements and conventions, Jurisdiction conflict is inevitable, so how to solve this kind of transnational jurisdiction conflict has become an urgent problem in current theory and practice. This paper makes a deep discussion on the legislation and practice of international private international law on the jurisdiction of intellectual property disputes, which is divided into six chapters. The first two chapters mainly elaborate on the characteristics of intellectual property and the causes of the conflicts of jurisdiction. The third chapter describes the jurisdiction system of intellectual property rights. This paper focuses on Chapter 4th, namely, the application of jurisdiction system in specific intellectual property cases, this chapter divides the dispute cases into three categories: first, the intellectual property right dispute, Focusing on the establishment, validity and jurisdiction of ownership of intellectual property rights; second, disputes over intellectual property rights contracts, focusing on the jurisdiction of intellectual property rights in the process of licensing and transfer; and third, infringement disputes over intellectual property rights, Focusing on the issue of jurisdiction after intellectual property rights have been infringed upon, this chapter makes an in-depth analysis of the practice and legislation of various types of intellectual property rights cases in various countries, and makes an assessment of its characteristics and shortcomings, The development trend of intellectual property jurisdiction system is described in Chapter 5th, because the legislation and practice of intellectual property jurisdiction system in various countries have a certain trend. This is of great importance to its spirit. Chapter 6th focuses on describing the current situation of China's intellectual property jurisdiction system and putting forward concrete suggestions on the construction of China's specific system. The theory and practice of the conflict of international jurisdiction will inevitably bring with it the problems of China's legislation. Because of the lack of a complete system of legislation on the jurisdiction of intellectual property disputes in China, Hope this article has certain reference function to Chinese intellectual property dispute jurisdiction international private law legislation.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997

【参考文献】