国际投资仲裁第三方资助的规制困境与出路——以国际投资仲裁“正当性危机”及其改革为背景

发布时间：2018-03-07 17:32

本文选题：第三方资助　切入点：国际投资仲裁　出处：《政法论坛》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：国际投资仲裁中的第三方资助近年来发展迅猛并形成产业,对国际投资仲裁制度造成重要影响。第三方资助的消极影响包括助长投资者滥诉、影响案件的公正裁决、妨碍争端的有效解决等。但是目前的国际投资仲裁制度无法对其进行有效控制。国际投资仲裁中的第三方资助及其发展和目前国际投资仲裁制度的弊端之间存在紧密联系。第三方资助因为国际投资仲裁存在这些弊端而产生和迅速发展;第三方资助的消极影响又加剧了国际投资仲裁的这些弊端,使其受到更多"正当性"的质疑。现有国际投资仲裁机制的弊端不能消除则第三方资助的危害也无法得到控制。对国际投资仲裁中第三方资助的规制不能就事论事,而必须放在国际投资仲裁"正当性危机"及其改革的大背景下,通过对国际投资仲裁的改革来进行。我国不能盲目肯定和接受第三方资助在国际投资仲裁中的运用,应积极推动国际投资争端解决机制的改革。
[Abstract]:Third-party financing in international investment arbitration has developed rapidly in recent years and formed industries, which have had an important impact on the international investment arbitration system... the negative effects of third-party financing include encouraging investors to oversue and affecting fair adjudication of cases, However, the current international investment arbitration system cannot effectively control it. There exists between the third party financing and its development in international investment arbitration and the drawbacks of the current international investment arbitration system. Close ties. Third party funding arises and develops rapidly because of these drawbacks in international investment arbitration; These disadvantages of international investment arbitration are exacerbated by the negative effects of third-party funding, If the disadvantages of the existing international investment arbitration mechanism can not be eliminated, the harm of the third party financing will not be controlled. The regulation of the third party financing in the international investment arbitration cannot be taken as the subject matter. Under the background of the "legitimacy crisis" of international investment arbitration and its reform, we must carry out the reform of international investment arbitration. We should actively promote the reform of the settlement mechanism of international investment disputes.
【作者单位】：中央财经大学法学院;
【分类号】：D997.4

【相似文献】