欧盟反补贴司法审查制度研究

发布时间：2018-03-07 18:12

本文选题：欧盟　切入点：反补贴　出处：《湖南师范大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：反补贴司法审查制度是针对反补贴调查及裁决的基本救济制度。WTO《补贴与反补贴措施协定》第23条明确要求各成员在其国内立法中建立并逐步完善反补贴司法审查制度。欧盟的反补贴司法审查制度经过多年的司法实践和判例的充实,到今天已经相当完善和成熟,对我国具有直接的借鉴作用。本文除绪论和结语外,共有六章：第一章界定了反补贴司法审查的概念,并从宏观上阐述了欧盟的相关立法规定,接着分析了欧盟确立该制度的正当性依据,阐述了欧盟反补贴司法审查制度与WTO争端解决机制的关系。第二章至第四章分别介绍了欧盟反补贴司法审查的主体、受案范围和审查标准,着重阐述的是适格原告享有诉权的前提和具体的原告种类,逐一具体介绍了在欧盟能提起司法审查的反补贴具体事项,分析了欧盟法院对于欧盟反补贴行政机构的自由裁量权的态度和在具体实践中所采取的具体审查标准。司法审查的主体、受案范围和审查标准这三个问题是欧盟反补贴司法审查制度的核心问题,结合大量案例进行分析,并从比较法的角度将欧盟的规定与美国和WTO的规定作了一定比较。第五章阐述了欧盟反补贴司法审查的四种诉讼类型,即相关利害关系人可以以何种形式提起司法审查,它们分别是：无效之诉、不作为之诉、损害赔偿之诉和先行裁决。关于诉讼类型,这是反补贴司法审查中欧盟所特有的一项内容。第六章讨论“我国反补贴司法审查制度及其完善”。虽然我国已初步建立反补贴司法审查制度,但尚有缺陷,主要表现在立法层次偏低、受案范围相对狭窄、审查标准过于严格等方面。我国应按照WTO规则的要求,借鉴欧盟的相关立法和实践经验,进一步完善我国的反补贴司法审查制度,以适应我国对外贸易新发展的现实需要。
[Abstract]:Countervailing Judicial Review system is the basic relief system for countervailing investigation and adjudication. Article 23 of the WTO Agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures explicitly requires members to establish and gradually improve the judicial review of countervailing in their domestic legislation. The EU's countervailing judicial review system has been enriched by years of judicial practice and jurisprudence. Today has been quite perfect and mature, China has a direct reference role. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, there are six chapters:. The first chapter defines the concept of countervailing judicial review, and from the macro point of view of the relevant EU legislative provisions, and then analyzes the legitimacy of the European Union to establish the system. This paper expounds the relationship between EU countervailing judicial review system and WTO dispute settlement mechanism. Chapter two to Chapter 4th respectively introduces the subject, the scope of the case and the standard of review of the EU countervailing judicial review, focusing on the premise and the specific types of plaintiffs that the suitably plaintiff has the right of action. One by one, it introduces the specific issues of countervailing which can be subject to judicial review in the EU. This paper analyzes the European Court's attitude towards the discretion of EU countervailing administrative bodies and the specific standards adopted in practice. The scope of the case and the standard of examination are the core issues of the judicial review system of countervailing subsidy in EU. This paper analyzes a large number of cases and compares the EU regulations with those of the United States and WTO from the perspective of comparative law. Chapter 5th elaborates four kinds of litigation types of EU countervailing judicial review, that is, the relevant interested parties can bring judicial review in what form, they are: the action of invalidity, the action of omission. As to the type of litigation, this is a special content of EU in the judicial review of countervailing. Chapter 6th discusses "our country countervailing judicial review system and its consummation". Although our country has initially established the countervailing judicial review system, but there are still defects, mainly in the low legislative level, relatively narrow scope of cases. In accordance with the requirements of WTO rules, our country should learn from the relevant legislation and practical experience of the European Union to further improve the judicial review system of countervailing measures in order to meet the practical needs of the new development of China's foreign trade.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996

【参考文献】