《纽约公约》视野下国际商事仲裁“非内国化”问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-07 19:35

本文选题：《纽约公约》　切入点：国际商事仲裁　出处：《郑州大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在国际商事仲裁发展的过程中,本着尊重当事人意思自治的原则,对于仲裁所适用的实体法,一般都允许当事人自主选择,而在程序法的适用上,近些年来也逐渐趋于赞同趋势,由于仲裁程序适用仲裁地法的传统观念的影响,其发展也受到了一定的阻碍。对于“非内国化”仲裁理论是当事人选择适用程序法的又一发展,也是对当事人意思自治范围的扩大。对于“非内国化”仲裁,理论界存在很多争议,本文立足于对促进国际商事仲裁发展发挥巨大作用的《纽约公约》中有关“非内国化”仲裁的内容,对于“非内国化”问题做了公约范围内的探讨,具体而言可以分为四个部分：第一部分：非内国化问题概述。简单介绍了“非内国化”仲裁的背景及理论依据,并且对《纽约公约》中“非内国化”仲裁的内容作了简单分析；第二部分：《纽约公约》下“非内国化”仲裁存在的合理性分析,结合《纽约公约》的具体规定对其合理性进行了论证；第三部分：根据《纽约公约》的具体规定,对“非内国化”仲裁的完善提出了自己的建议；第四部分结合中国国情,具体分析了中国仲裁中采用“非内国化”理论的意义,与此同时中国仲裁法完善的提出了若干建议。
[Abstract]:In the course of the development of international commercial arbitration, in line with the principle of respecting the autonomy of the parties, the parties are generally allowed to choose the substantive law applicable to arbitration, but in the application of procedural law, In recent years, it tends to agree with the trend, because of the influence of the traditional idea that the arbitration procedure applies to the law of the place of arbitration, its development has also been hindered to some extent. The theory of "non-internalization" arbitration is another development of the parties' choice of the applicable procedural law. It is also an expansion of the scope of party autonomy. There are many disputes in the theoretical circle for "non-internalization" arbitration. Based on the contents of "non-internalization" arbitration in the New York Convention, which plays an important role in promoting the development of international commercial arbitration, this paper discusses the issue of "non-internalization" within the scope of the Convention. Specifically, it can be divided into four parts:. The first part is an overview of non-internalization. It briefly introduces the background and theoretical basis of "non-internalization" arbitration, and makes a brief analysis of the content of "non-internalization" arbitration in the New York Convention. The second part: the rationality analysis of the existence of "non-internalization" arbitration under the New York Convention, combined with the specific provisions of the New York Convention, the third part: according to the specific provisions of the New York Convention, The author puts forward his own suggestions on the perfection of "non-internalization" arbitration, and analyzes the significance of the theory of "non-internalization" in China's arbitration in the light of China's national conditions in 4th, and at the same time puts forward some suggestions for the perfection of China's arbitration law.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997.4

【相似文献】