论国际商事仲裁中的既判力问题

发布时间：2018-03-10 11:01

本文选题：国际商事仲裁　切入点：既判力　出处：《外交学院》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：虽然既判力原则是公认的法律原则,但国际商事仲裁中仍缺乏统一的既判力规则。问题根源在于不同法域的所采用的既判力规则不同,而既判力规则通常又被看作是强行法规则或者公共政策。产生法律冲突的直接原因是因为连接点不明,仲裁地法律,裁决/判决的承认地法律,以及仲裁协议的管辖法律都有可能适用。本文第一章研究并论证了:国际商事仲裁裁决的既判力并非强行法或公共政策,其规则可由当事人依意思自治商定。进而,可通过制定具有软法性质的统一规则,供仲裁当事人选用,或供仲裁员、律师参考,以减轻或消除冲突。第二章及第三章在对主要法域的既判力规则的比较研究,以及主要仲裁机构的既有实践的总结的基础上,论证了统一规则的实际可行性,并尝试提炼出了若干规则。在第四章中,笔者就仲裁中的程序性裁定是否产生既判力这一问题进行了研究,笔者认为,由于涉及法院和仲裁机构间的权限分配,故不宜概括地给出肯定或否定答案。律师与仲裁员在实务中仍应关注各主要法域和主要仲裁机构的实践。本文的比较研究旨在学理和实务上都能有所裨益。
[Abstract]:Although res judicata is a recognized principle of law, there is still a lack of uniform res judicata rules in international commercial arbitration. The problem stems from the fact that the rules of res judicata are different in different jurisdictions, The rule of res judicata is often seen as a jus cogens rule or a public policy. The direct cause of conflict of laws is the unclear point of connection, the law of the place of arbitration, the law of recognition of the award / judgment, Chapter one of this paper studies and demonstrates that the res judicata of an international commercial arbitration award is not jus cogens or public policy, and its rules can be agreed upon by the parties according to their will. By developing uniform rules of a soft law nature for selection by the parties to arbitration or for the information of arbitrators and lawyers to mitigate or eliminate conflicts... chapters II and III are a comparative study of the res judicata rules in major jurisdictions, On the basis of summing up the existing practice of major arbitration institutions, this paper demonstrates the practical feasibility of uniform rules, and tries to extract some rules. In Chapter 4th, The author studies whether procedural decisions in arbitration produce res judicata. The author believes that, because of the allocation of jurisdiction between the court and the arbitration institution, In practice, lawyers and arbitrators should still pay attention to the practice of major jurisdictions and major arbitration institutions. The comparative study of this paper aims to be of benefit both in theory and practice.
【学位授予单位】：外交学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D997.4

【相似文献】