TPP知识产权规则及其对我国的启示
本文选题:TPP 切入点:知识产权 出处:《广东财经大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:在经济飞速增长背景下,知识产权发挥的作用日益受到人们的关注。以美国、欧盟为首的发达国家因为掌握了先进的科学技术并拥有完善的知识产权保护体系,为了实现本国知识产权利益的最大化,他们积极建立并推进知识产权高标准化保护。跨太平洋伙伴关系协议历经5年于2015年10月取得最终谈判,这标志着一个占全球经济总量40%的新国际协议达成。知识产权议题作为TPP整个谈判涉及诸多议题中的重点内容之一,从谈判开始就受到国际社会极大的关注。知识产权保护经历了从与多边贸易相结合,到实现双边以及复边体制的演化。通过与《TRIPs协议》以及ACTA进行比较可以看出,TPP在著作权领域,加强了对数字知识产权的保护,并且延长了著作权的保护期限,专利和商标权保护的范围得到了扩大,不仅将"气味"纳入了可授予商标的范围,还加强了对域名、地理标志及驰名商标的保护;知识产权执法规则也相对提高,例如民事救济实行的附加赔偿制度,刑事制裁的门槛降低,过境措施的适用范围扩大到了进口、出口和过境三个环节。这些条款都体现了当今全球知识产权保护的最新发展趋势和最高标准。中国的知识产权保护虽然起步20世纪80年代年,但30多年间里发展迅速。特别是自从加入世界贸易组织以来,中国知识产权保护的水平迅速提升,中国与周边国家签订的自由贸易协定中的知识产权部分也逐渐体现出高标准的保护趋势。面对TPP知识产权规则所带来的压力,结合我国当前情况,我国现行的法律体系和TPP的有关规定仍存在一定差距。我们必须谨慎地对待这些差异,理性地借鉴,从而从容地应对知识产权强保护的发展趋势,积极维护本国利益。
[Abstract]:In the context of rapid economic growth, the role of intellectual property rights has increasingly attracted people's attention. Developed countries, led by the United States and the European Union, have mastered advanced science and technology and have a sound intellectual property protection system. In order to maximize the benefits of their intellectual property rights, they are actively establishing and promoting a highly standardized protection of intellectual property rights. The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement was finally negotiated in October 2015 after five years. This marks the conclusion of a new international agreement that accounts for 40% of the global economy. The intellectual property issue is one of the key issues covered in the TPP negotiations. From the beginning of the negotiations, it has received great attention from the international community. The protection of intellectual property rights has experienced a combination of multilateral trade, Through the comparison with the TRIPs Agreement and the ACTA, we can see that the TPP has strengthened the protection of digital intellectual property rights in the field of copyright, and has also extended the duration of copyright protection. The scope of the protection of patents and trademark rights has been expanded, not only to include "smell" in the scope of trademarks that can be granted, but also to strengthen the protection of domain names, geographical indications and well-known trademarks, and the enforcement of intellectual property rights has also been relatively improved. For example, the additional compensation system implemented by civil remedies, the lowering of the threshold for criminal sanctions, and the extension of the scope of application of transit measures to imports, Export and transit links. These articles reflect the latest development trend and the highest standards of intellectual property protection in the world today. Although China's intellectual property protection started in 1980s, But in more than 30 years, the level of intellectual property protection in China has risen rapidly, especially since China joined the World Trade Organization. The intellectual property part of the free trade agreement signed between China and the neighboring countries is also gradually reflecting the trend of high standards of protection. In the face of the pressure brought by the TPP intellectual property rules, and in the light of the current situation in China, There is still a certain gap between the current legal system of our country and the relevant provisions of TPP, and we must treat these differences carefully and use them rationally for reference, so as to deal with the development trend of strong protection of intellectual property and actively safeguard our national interests.
【学位授予单位】:广东财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D997.1;D923.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 叶辉华;;国际知识产权制度的发展演进:基于国家立场与利益冲突[J];湖南科技学院学报;2017年01期
2 金安;宋红爽;陈静静;;TPP高标准知识产权条款之合理性分析[J];法制与社会;2016年31期
3 周雪雅;;TPP知识产权规则及其影响[J];合作经济与科技;2016年17期
4 董海珍;;针对TPP中知识产权条款我国知识产权存在的问题及对策研究[J];产权导刊;2016年09期
5 张乃根;;试析TPP知识产权条款的TRIPS追加义务[J];海关与经贸研究;2016年04期
6 贾平;邱仁宗;翟晓梅;;资本抑或民生:全球化背景下知识产权的战略应对——以泛太平洋伙伴协定(TPP)专利保护法律制度为例[J];自然辩证法研究;2016年06期
7 庄媛媛;卢冠锋;;TPP与TRIPS知识产权规则比较研究[J];亚太经济;2016年03期
8 詹映;;国际贸易体制区域化背景下知识产权国际立法新动向[J];国际经贸探索;2016年04期
9 谢青轶;;《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》(TPP)的专利条款研究[J];知识产权;2016年01期
10 刘会芳;;中国参与TPP谈判的政治经济分析——以知识产权条款为研究视角[J];科技管理研究;2015年16期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 冯汉桥;;对外贸易中知识产权执法与司法保护协调问题研究[A];《WTO法与中国论坛》文集——中国法学会世界贸易组织法研究会年会论文集(七)[C];2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 陈子竹;国际条约中的知识产权执法保护探析[D];山东大学;2016年
2 卫诗华;Trips-plus背景下中国FTA知识产权保护条款研究[D];浙江财经大学;2016年
3 陶文怡;我国知识产权保护法律制度研究[D];云南财经大学;2013年
,本文编号:1615586
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1615586.html