国际争端解决的司法途径及中国的应对——从南海仲裁案说起

发布时间：2018-04-09 18:05

本文选题：国际争端　切入点：司法途径　出处：《现代国际关系》2016年10期

【摘要】：中国一直主张和平解决国际争端,这种和平手段主要分为政治与司法两种并在全球化时代日益发挥重要的作用,越来越多的国家更倾向于运用司法方式解决国际争端。在无政府状态下,主权国家出于本国国家利益的考虑、结合争端本身的特点选择最适宜的争端解决方式,是国际争端是否能够和平解决的决定性因素。国际争端解决的司法化趋势不影响国家依据国际法所赋予的合法权利、自身偏好自主选择国际争端的解决方式。中国对"南海仲裁案"的"四不"立场,完全是由于仲裁案本身严重违反国际法,并不能由此否认中国参与和支持国际司法的积极立场和态度。面对复杂的国际形势,中国想要成功实现和平崛起,必须把握运用政治、司法手段处理国际争端的"黄金分割点",提升在国际公约的制定等议题上的话语权、争端规则的动议和谈判能力等,以在国际司法程序中增加胜算。
[Abstract]:Chinese has always advocated the peaceful settlement of international disputes by peaceful means, this is mainly divided into two kinds of political and judicial and play an increasingly important role in the era of globalization, more and more countries tend to use the judicial settlement of international disputes. In the anarchic state for national sovereignty, national interests, combined with the characteristics of the dispute itself choice the most suitable means of dispute resolution is a decisive factor to the peaceful settlement of international disputes is based on international law. The state does not affect the judicial trend of international dispute settlement with the legitimate rights of their own preferences to choose the international dispute solution. Chinese on "Nanhai arbitration" "four" position, is entirely due to the case of a serious violation of international law, and cannot be denied Chinese participation and support of the international judicial positive stance and attitude. Facing the complex international situation, If China wants to succeed in achieving peaceful rise, we must grasp the golden section point of dealing with international disputes by means of political and judicial means, enhance the right to speak on issues such as the formulation of international conventions, the motion and negotiation ability of dispute rules, and so on, so as to increase the odds in international judicial proceedings.

【作者单位】：吉林大学行政学院国际政治系;吉林大学国家治理与协同创新中心;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目《美国“亚太再平衡”战略对中国朝鲜半岛政策的挑战与对策研究》(16BGJ037)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D993.5

【相似文献】