欧盟协议管辖制度实施之保障研究

发布时间：2018-04-11 08:06

本文选题：平行诉讼 + 协议管辖　；参考：《现代法学》2017年06期

【摘要】：对于平行诉讼问题的解决,欧洲法院对先系属优先原则之僵化解释,减损了协议管辖制度的价值,促使"鱼雷诉讼"的产生,也有悖人权法的价值。为矫正欧洲法院过于强调法律确定性的做法,发挥协议管辖制度在解决欧盟平行诉讼问题上的作用,理论界和实务界提出了保障协议管辖制度的间接方法和直接方法。保障协议管辖制度之间接方法并不能妥善解决平行诉讼问题。《布鲁塞尔条例Ⅰ修订案》第31条第2款作为保障协议管辖制度之直接方法,能够相对有效地规制该问题的产生。在直接方法的实施中,应明确管辖协议的范围及存在的证明标准,协议管辖权与应诉管辖权的关系,以及协议管辖权与先系属优先原则的关系。对欧盟相关理论与实践的研究,有助于更为深入地理解国际私法中的协议管辖制度。
[Abstract]:The rigid interpretation of the principle of primacy by the European Court of Justice detracts from the value of the agreement jurisdiction system, promotes the "torpedo litigation", and runs counter to the value of human rights law.In order to correct the European Court of Justice's practice of emphasizing too much legal certainty and to give full play to the role of the agreement jurisdiction system in solving the problems of parallel litigation in the European Union, the theoretical and practical circles put forward the indirect and direct methods of the safeguard agreement jurisdiction system.The indirect method of the safeguard agreement jurisdiction system can not solve the problem of parallel litigation properly. As a direct method of the safeguard agreement jurisdiction system, Article 31 (2) of the Brussels Regulation I Amendment can regulate the emergence of this problem relatively effectively.In the implementation of the direct method, the scope of the jurisdiction agreement and the standard of proof of its existence, the relationship between the agreement jurisdiction and the response jurisdiction, and the relation between the agreement jurisdiction and the primacy principle should be clearly defined.The research on the theory and practice of EU is helpful to understand the system of jurisdiction in private international law.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学法学院;
【基金】：2016年度国家社科基金青年项目“《欧洲人权公约》在国际私法中的适用问题研究”(16CFX067) 2014年度国家社科基金重大项目“中国涉外民事关系法体系完善研究”(14ZDC032) 中央高校基本科研业务经费项目(21141610607)
【分类号】：D997.3

【相似文献】