中国双边投资条约核心条款研究

发布时间：2018-04-11 20:42

本文选题：国际投资 + 双边投资条约　；参考：《华中科技大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：伴随着快速发展的全球经济一体化以及20世纪90年代以来蓬勃兴起的修约热潮，双边投资条约在内容上呈现出新的特点和新的发展趋势。由于缔约时间晚、缺乏足够经验等原因，导致中国的双边投资条约存在不少漏洞与隐患，亟待完善更新。本文以中国双边投资条约中的投资待遇、征收与补偿、争端解决事项三项核心条款作为研究对象，通过与美国、德国的对比分析，探究中国新时代背景下修订条约的可行方案。投资待遇条款部分着重探讨公平公正待遇的实质内涵、是否构成赔偿责任，以及最惠国待遇能否适用于程序性事项等，深入分析比较了中国与美国、德国在最惠国待遇、公平公正待遇条款方面的差异。征收与补偿条款主要从间接征收与补偿标准的确定方面展开研究。投资争端与解决条款部分，，深入研究了用尽当地救济、保护伞条款、重大安全例外等问题。研究结论是，中国双边投资条约中的表述存在缺陷，规定尚不统一，自身权力运用不合理，防御条款设置不全面。在具体的改进措施方面，要对公平公正待遇的定义作出明确解释，规定其适用例外，最惠国待遇必须排除程序性事项的适用；要完善对间接征收的认定，将符合公共利益的管理措施排除在适用情形之外，对征收补偿标准采取统一的表述；在投资争端与解决方面必须以国家利益为重，排除一切外来不良因素的干扰，坚决捍卫属于东道国的合理权力。籍此研究，希望这些问题能够引起有关方面的重视，加强对潜在风险的防范，以切实保护中国投资者及其投资的正当利益。更希望在未来的缔约实践中，通过对双边投资条约的不断修订完善，实现中国新时代背景下的预期利益——互利互惠，促进经济发展；和平崛起，建立国际新秩序。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of global economic integration and the booming upsurge of treaty revision since 1990s, bilateral investment treaties (bits) show new characteristics and new trends in content.Due to the late contracting time and lack of experience, there are many loopholes and hidden dangers in China's bilateral investment treaties, which need to be improved and updated urgently.This paper takes the three core clauses of China's bilateral investment treaty (bits), such as investment treatment, expropriation and compensation, and dispute settlement as the object of study. Through comparative analysis with the United States and Germany, this paper explores the feasible scheme of revising the treaty under the background of the new era of China.The article mainly discusses the essence of fair and just treatment, whether it constitutes liability for compensation, and whether MFN treatment can be applied to procedural matters, and analyzes and compares China, the United States and Germany in MFN treatment.Differences in terms of fair and equitable treatment.Expropriation and compensation clauses mainly from the indirect expropriation and compensation criteria for the determination of the study.In the part of investment dispute and settlement clause, the problems such as exhaustion of local remedies, umbrella clause, major security exception and so on are studied in depth.The conclusion of the study is that there are some defects in the expression of China's bilateral investment treaty, the provisions are not uniform, the application of its own power is unreasonable, and the defense clause is not comprehensive.With regard to specific improvement measures, the definition of fair and just treatment should be clearly interpreted and the application of exceptions to its application should be stipulated. MFN treatment must exclude the application of procedural matters, and the determination of indirect expropriation should be improved.Excluding management measures in line with the public interest from the applicable circumstances and adopting a unified formulation of the standard of compensation for expropriation; in the area of investment disputes and settlement, the national interest must be paramount and all undesirable external factors should be eliminated,Resolutely defend the legitimate power of the host country.Based on this study, we hope that these problems can arouse the attention of relevant parties and strengthen the prevention of potential risks, so as to protect the legitimate interests of Chinese investors and their investments.It is hoped that in the practice of contracting in the future, through the continuous revision and perfection of bilateral investment treaties, the expected interests of China under the background of the new era will be realized-mutual benefit and mutual benefit, and economic development will be promoted, and a new international order will be established through the peaceful rise of bilateral investment treaties.
【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D996.4

【参考文献】