国际贸易中的知识产权滥用问题及其法律规制研究

发布时间：2018-04-12 17:17

本文选题：知识产权滥用 + 国际贸易　；参考：《中国政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：知识产权滥用是指知识产权人行使知识产权超过了适当限度,违反了法律规定或公共政策,主要表现为不合理地拒绝或限制他人使用其知识产权的各种行为。知识产权滥用限制了技术成果的创新和传播,扰乱了公平竞争的国际市场秩序,其对国际贸易的扭曲和阻碍早已引起国际社会的广泛关注与警惕:以WIPO为代表的各大国际组织很早就开始了规制知识产权滥用的立法尝试;TRIPs协定继承并发展了之前众多国际知识产权公约的理念,明确了规制知识产权滥用的基本原则,构建了有一定拘束力的知识产权滥用规制体系,并为WTO成员的相关国内立法预留了很大空间。以美国和欧盟为代表的世界主要国家和地区则通过立法的不断改革和案例的大量积累,形成了各自的规制原则和规则。我国2008年8月1日开始实施的《中华人民共和国反垄断法》第55条亦对规制知识产权滥用做出了原则性规定,但由于该法的相关配套规章、条例尚不完备,与其他法律的衔接和协调仍处于摸索阶段,因此尚有很大的完善空间。本文从知识产权的本质属性入手,考察“知识产权滥用”的源起及其在国际法和各国法律中的不同含义,辨析相关易混淆概念,在厘清知识产权滥用基本内涵的基础上,审视其对国际贸易的危害,分析与解读TRIPs协定等国际知识产权公约中规制知识产权滥用的相关条款,并以美国和欧盟为主要考察对象,主要运用历史分析和比较分析的研究方法,深入考察欧美相关制度的历史沿革和发展趋势,结合典型案例,研究规制知识产权滥用的主要法律原则和规则。最后,回顾《反垄断法》通过前后我国规制知识产权滥用的法律制度的发展变革,针对目前存在的主要问题,就如何建立一个与我国自身经济与科技发展水平相适应的、完备而有效的知识产权滥用法律规制体系提出一些有益、可行的建议。
[Abstract]:The abuse of intellectual property means that the intellectual property right is exercised by the intellectual property owner in excess of the appropriate limit, which violates the legal regulations or public policies, and is mainly manifested in various behaviors that unreasonably refuse or restrict others to use their intellectual property rights.The abuse of intellectual property rights limits the innovation and dissemination of technological achievements and disrupts the international market order of fair competition.Its distortion and hindrance to international trade have already aroused widespread concern and vigilance in the international community: the major international organizations, represented by WIPO, have long begun legislative attempts to regulate the abuse of intellectual property rights, and the trips Agreement has inherited and developed it.The ideas of many previous international intellectual property conventions,This paper clarifies the basic principles of regulating the abuse of intellectual property rights, constructs a binding system of regulation of abuse of intellectual property rights, and reserves a lot of space for the relevant domestic legislation of WTO members.The main countries and regions in the world, represented by the United States and the European Union, have formed their respective rules and regulations through the continuous reform of legislation and the accumulation of cases.Article 55 of the Anti-Monopoly Law of the people's Republic of China, which came into effect on August 1, 2008, also provides for the regulation of the abuse of intellectual property rights in principle. However, due to the relevant supporting regulations of the law, the regulations are not complete.The connection and coordination with other laws are still in the groping stage, so there is still a lot of room for improvement.Starting with the essential attribute of intellectual property, this paper examines the origin of "abuse of intellectual property" and its different meanings in international law and other countries' laws, discriminates the relevant confusing concepts, and clarifies the basic connotation of abuse of intellectual property.This paper examines its harm to international trade, analyzes and interprets the relevant provisions of international intellectual property rights conventions such as the TRIPs Agreement to regulate the abuse of intellectual property rights, and takes the United States and the European Union as the main objects of investigation.By means of historical analysis and comparative analysis, this paper makes a thorough investigation of the historical evolution and development trend of the relevant institutions in Europe and the United States, and studies the main legal principles and rules governing the abuse of intellectual property rights in combination with typical cases.Finally, after reviewing the development and transformation of the legal system governing the abuse of intellectual property rights in China before and after the adoption of the Anti-monopoly Law, and in view of the main problems existing at present, how to establish a system suitable to the level of economic and scientific and technological development of our country,A complete and effective legal regulation system of intellectual property abuse is put forward some useful and feasible suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.1;D997.1;D922.294

【参考文献】