国际投资法中违反非征收投资条约义务的损害赔偿研究

发布时间：2018-05-02 08:26

  本文选题：非征收违反 + 充分赔偿原理　； 参考：《甘肃政法学院学报》2012年03期

【摘要】：现代国际投资协定的两大显著特征表现为:一方面规定了大量的投资实体权利保护条款,另一方面又规定了投资者诉东道国的创新性直诉权。在实体权利条款中,国际投资协定规定了征收必须提供"充分、及时、有效"的赔偿;但是,对于东道国可能违反其它投资协定条款的赔偿却没有做出具体规定。随着大量非征收违反案件的出现,投资仲裁庭开始求助于霍茹夫工厂案标准以及编纂了《国家责任条款草案》,并创造性地将之适用于非征收违反案件,但是这种适用也引发了一些需要思考的问题。
[Abstract]:Two prominent features of modern IIAS are: on the one hand, it stipulates a large number of investment entity rights protection clauses, on the other hand, it stipulates the innovative right of appeal from investors to host countries. In the substantive rights clause, the IIA provides that expropriation must provide "adequate, timely and effective" compensation; however, there is no specific provision for compensation for possible breaches of other IIA provisions by the host country. With the emergence of a large number of cases of non-expropriation violations, the investment tribunal began to resort to the Chorzouf factory standards and to compile the draft articles on State responsibility, and creatively applied them to cases of non-expropriation violations, But this application also raises some questions to think about.
【作者单位】： 厦门大学法学院;
【分类号】：D996.4
，

本文编号：1833146