〈反假冒贸易协定〉中的知识产权海关保护制度研究

发布时间：2018-05-06 04:02

本文选题：《反假冒贸易协议》(ACTA) + 知识产权　；参考：《西南政法大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：知识产权海关保护制度是指各国以海关为主的行政机关,在进出口环节对含有知识产权侵权的商品采取扣押、中止放行的措施,及时阻止侵权商品进入一国流通的法律制度,被称为是知识产权保护的“最有效的行政救济方法”。本文旨在对2010年12月3日公布的《反假冒贸易协议》(ACTA)进行分析,探讨该协议中所规定的海关保护制度与TRIPs协议所规定的海关保护制度之间的差异,并进而对该协议与我国现行海关保护制度进行比较,试图在此基础上,预测该协议构建的海关保护制度对我国企业和产业的影响,从而寻找有效的应对之策。全文两万余字,共分为五个部分。第一部分为概述,首先界定了知识产权海关保护制度的相关概念,论述了该制度对知识产权保护的重要作用,并从海关保护制度的公益性质出发,阐明了知识产权的保护要注意适度保护的问题,还对ACTA的制定背景进行了简单介绍。第二部分,探讨了ACTA中海关保护制度与TRIPs相关规定的差异。一是海关保护客体范围不同,表现在：要求适用的知识产权种类有所增多、适用的侵权行为种类有所扩大、适用的海关环节有所扩大、能够享受措施豁免的物品范围有所缩小；二是赋予海关当局的权限有所扩大,表现在：赋予海关当局自行采取行动的权力、海关向当事人披露信息的权限有所扩大；三是海关保护程序更加便捷高效,表现在：更完善的权利申请程序、更放松的担保或保证形式、更高效的权利救济方式；四是对被申请人权利的限制有所增多;此外,还分析了关于海关保护中的平行进口问题。第三部分,将ACTA中知识产权海关保护制度与我国相关规定进行了比较分析,特别是在关于出口货物的适用、关于过境中货物的适用、关于小件货物和个人行李的适用、以及对提交反担保放行的态度等方面,二者存在一定的差异。第四部分,论述了ACTA中知识产权海关保护制度的影响,正面影响主要表现在它提高了知识产权的海关保护水平,负面影响主要表现在大大增加了贸易成本,导致新的国际贸易壁垒的产生。第五部分,提出了我国应对ACTA知识产权海关保护制度的对策建议。ACTA必将对我国企业带来一定的负面影响,我国可以采取适当措施以规避过境货物的风险、有效处理侵权货物,以迎接ACTA带来的新挑战。
[Abstract]:The system of customs protection of intellectual property rights refers to the legal system in which the customs administrations of various countries take measures to seize and suspend the release of goods containing intellectual property rights infringement in the import and export links, and to prevent the infringing commodities from entering the circulation of a country in a timely manner. It is called "the most effective administrative remedy" for the protection of intellectual property rights. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTAA) published on December 3, 2010, and to explore the differences between the customs protection system stipulated in the Agreement and the Customs Protection system stipulated in the TRIPs Agreement. On the basis of the comparison between the agreement and the current customs protection system of our country, this paper attempts to predict the influence of the customs protection system constructed by the agreement on the enterprises and industries of our country, so as to find effective countermeasures. Full text more than 20,000 words, a total of five parts. The first part is an overview, first defines the relevant concepts of the system of customs protection of intellectual property rights, discusses the important role of the system in the protection of intellectual property rights, and starts from the commonweal nature of the system of customs protection. This paper clarifies that the protection of intellectual property should pay attention to the problem of moderate protection, and briefly introduces the background of the formulation of ACTA. The second part discusses the differences between the customs protection system of ACTA and the relevant regulations of TRIPs. First, the scope of the object of customs protection is different, which is manifested in: the types of intellectual property rights required to be applied have increased, the types of applicable infringement acts have been expanded, the applicable customs links have been expanded, and the scope of articles that can enjoy the exemption of measures has been narrowed; Second, the powers given to the customs authorities have been expanded, as shown by: giving the customs authorities the power to take action on their own and the authority of the customs to disclose information to the parties; and third, the customs protection procedures are more convenient and efficient. They are: more perfect procedure of application, more relaxed form of guarantee or guarantee, more efficient way of right relief; fourth, more restrictions on the rights of the respondent; in addition, the problem of parallel import in customs protection is also analyzed. In the third part, the author makes a comparative analysis of the customs protection system of intellectual property rights in ACTA and the relevant provisions of our country, especially on the application of export goods, goods in transit, small goods and personal luggage. There are some differences between them in the attitude of submitting anti-guarantee release. In the fourth part, the author discusses the influence of the intellectual property protection system in ACTA. The positive influence is mainly reflected in the improvement of the level of customs protection of intellectual property rights, and the negative effect is mainly reflected in the increase of trade costs. Lead to the emergence of new international trade barriers. In the fifth part, the author puts forward the countermeasures and suggestions to the customs protection system of ACTA intellectual property rights. ACTA will inevitably bring some negative effects to Chinese enterprises. China can take appropriate measures to avoid the risk of goods in transit and deal with the infringing goods effectively. To meet the new challenges brought by ACTA.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997

【参考文献】