浅论钓鱼岛的领土主权问题

发布时间：2018-05-09 03:31

本文选题：钓鱼岛 + 领土主权　；参考：《华东政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：中日两国对于钓鱼岛主权的归属问题,近代以来一直在争论,是近代以来影响中日两国关系的一个非常重要的的问题。一直以来,钓鱼岛都是影响中日关系的一个十分复杂的问题,这个问题不仅涉及到中国的国家主权,领土完整,而且也涉及历史及法律方面的各种问题,因此一直以来都受到各方面的关注。因此深入探讨中日双方在解决钓鱼岛问题及东海大陆架划界上的立场及解决方式,对于缓和中日双方之间的矛盾以及维护自己的合法权益,都有十分重要的现实意义。自古以来,钓鱼岛就是中国的领土,这是毋庸置疑的,然而,近代以来,日本一直挖空心思的夺我钓鱼岛,并采取一系列的行动以霸占钓鱼岛,这些都是应该引起我们足够重视并应该努力区解决的一些问题。在内容上,本文首先介绍了钓鱼岛问题的由来和争议概要,日本方面主张钓鱼岛一直以来都是无主地,同本对其是进行了无主地先占而取得领土主权；而中国则分别从三个角度论证了钓鱼岛自古以来就属于中国的领土。然后再从国际法的角度分析钓鱼岛的领土主权归属。东海是我国大陆东岸与日本海之间的半封闭海,东海大陆架蕴藏着丰富的资源,开采便利,加之有重要的军事价值,中日两国对这些领域的归属及划分,产生了很大的争议。钓鱼岛的领土主权到底归属于谁,两国一直争论不休,但是一直以来却也没有得到解决。中同两国在东海划界这个问题上是存在着很大的分歧的,分歧主要集中在两个方面,一是关于东海大陆架的划界原则,二是关于钓鱼岛及冲绳海槽在大陆架划界中的地位。在划界原则问题上,同本认为使用中间线原则是合适的方法,而中国则主张自然延伸和公平原则相结合的情况下,再考虑其他相关因素,通过双方的协商来解决这些问题。中同围绕钓鱼岛问题展开激烈的争论,中国从国际法的各个角度不断的论证钓鱼群岛是中国的领土,而同本也以其对钓鱼岛是无主地先占为理由,也主张其对钓鱼岛拥有主权。由于钓鱼岛周边丰富的资源以及重要的战略地位,中日双方均对钓鱼岛主张权利,而对于这个问题,一直以来都没有特别有效的方式来解决,而争端一直都存在,因此近期要解决钓鱼岛问题难度很大。
[Abstract]:The sovereignty of Diaoyu Islands between China and Japan has always been debated since modern times, which is a very important issue affecting the relations between China and Japan since modern times. The Diaoyu Islands have all along been a very complex issue affecting Sino-Japanese relations. This issue involves not only China's national sovereignty and territorial integrity, but also various historical and legal issues. As a result, it has always been the focus of attention from all sides. Therefore, it is of great practical significance for China and Japan to discuss their positions and solutions on the settlement of the Diaoyu Island problem and the delimitation of the continental shelf in the East China Sea in order to alleviate the contradiction between China and Japan and to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests. Since ancient times, the Diaoyu Islands have been the territory of China, which is beyond doubt. However, since modern times, Japan has been trying its best to seize the Diaoyu Islands, and has taken a series of actions to occupy the Diaoyu Islands. These are some problems that we should pay enough attention to and try our best to solve. In the content, this article first introduced the Diaoyu Island question origin and the dispute summary, the Japanese side maintains the Diaoyu Island has been all along has no owner land, same this is carries on the no owner land first to acquire the territory sovereignty; China, on the other hand, has demonstrated Diaoyu Island's territory since ancient times from three angles. Then the territorial sovereignty of Diaoyu Island is analyzed from the angle of international law. The East China Sea is a semi-enclosed sea between the eastern coast of the mainland of China and the Sea of Japan. The continental shelf of the East China Sea is rich in resources, easy to exploit and has important military value. The Diaoyu Islands' territorial sovereignty, which the two countries have been arguing about, has never been resolved. There are great differences between China and China on the delimitation of the East China Sea. The differences mainly focus on two aspects, one is the delimitation principle of the continental shelf in the East China Sea, the other is the status of the Diaoyu Islands and the Okinawa trough in the delimitation of the continental shelf. On the issue of demarcation principle, the author thinks that the use of the intermediate line principle is an appropriate method, while China advocates the combination of natural extension and equity principle, taking into account other relevant factors, and resolving these problems through consultation between the two sides. China and China have argued from various angles of international law that the fishing Islands are China's territory, and that China also claims sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands on the grounds that it has no ownership of the Diaoyu Islands. Because of the rich resources and important strategic position around the Diaoyu Islands, both China and Japan claim the right to the Diaoyu Islands, but there has been no particularly effective way to resolve this issue, and the dispute has always existed. Therefore, it is very difficult to solve the Diaoyu Island problem in the near future.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D993

【引证文献】