论国际投资条约下自裁决式根本安全利益条款的审查进路——兼论中国的选择

发布时间：2018-05-10 09:07

本文选题：自裁决式条款 + 根本安全利益　；参考：《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：国际投资条约中的自裁决式根本安全利益条款是东道国维护国家安全利益、捍卫国家主权之利器。自裁决条款能否实现其功能,基础为条款的文义及结构,决定性因素则在于裁判机构对条款所采取的审查标准。因有关善意审查的标准和展开步骤尚未统一,该条款能否发挥缔约国所设想的功能尚不确凿。WTO争端解决机构针对GATT第20条所确立的审查标准,欧洲法院所确立的自由裁判余地原则及国内法院在行政司法审判中所确立的审查标准,可为国际投资仲裁庭展开善意审查提供有益借鉴。我国国际投资条约中自裁决式根本安全利益条款的建构及完善,应以对该条款的审查标准、步骤及实际功能的深入理解为基础,并以平衡国家安全利益及投资者利益为价值理念。
[Abstract]:The self-adjudicating fundamental security interest clause in international investment treaties is a weapon for the host country to safeguard the national security interests and national sovereignty. Whether the self-adjudication clause can realize its function is based on the meaning and structure of the clause, and the decisive factor lies in the standard adopted by the referee to review the clause. As the criteria and the steps for conducting a bona fide review have not yet been harmonized, it is not clear whether this provision can fulfil the functions envisaged by the contracting parties. The review standards established by the dispute settlement body in relation to Article 20 of the GATT, The principle of freedom of adjudication established by the European Court of Justice and the standard of review established by domestic courts in the administrative judicial trial can provide useful reference for the international investment arbitration tribunal to carry out a bona fide review. The construction and perfection of the self-adjudicating fundamental security interest clause in China's international investment treaties should be based on a thorough understanding of the standards, steps and practical functions of the review. And to balance the interests of national security and the interests of investors as the value of the concept.
【作者单位】：浙江大学光华法学院;
【分类号】：D996.4

【相似文献】