国际海上再保险合同的法律适用问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-11 23:39

本文选题：海上再保险合同 + 法律适用　；参考：《大连海事大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：通常来讲,国际海上再保险合同的当事人都是具备一定专业能力的保险公司,因而一般不会出现未进行法律选择的情况。但由于各国对法律选择的限制不同,当事人的选择并非在所有国家法律下都是有效的。此外,在临时再保险中,海上再保险合同一般会将原海上保险合同并入,而不再单独订立法律选择条款,不同法院对这种整体并入是否将法律选择条款包含在内持有不同意见。当法院持否定态度时,海上再保险合同就会呈现出未约定准据法的状态。我国海上再保险起步较晚,相关的配套法规并不完备,国际私法方面对海上再保险合同准据法的规定更是一片空白。为解决此类问题,本文旨在通过对国际私法较为先进且海上再保险业较为发达的欧盟地区和美国的法律及判例进行研究,总结出其在处理类似案件时所采取的法律选择方法的特点及其发展趋势,以供我国参考和借鉴。除引言和结论外,本文共分为三章：第一章,在介绍国际海上再保险合同含义和性质的基础上,分析了其与原海上保险合同的关系及其法律冲突产生的原因。第二章,首先对《罗马公约》和《罗马条例Ⅰ》进行比较分析,总结出欧盟与海上再保险合同相关的冲突法规范的发展趋势。其次,从近三年来美国各州法院对各种法律选择方法的采纳情况入手,分析美国当今法律选择方法所呈现出的新特点。第三章,以“意思自治原则”和“最密切联系原则”为主线,结合我国国情,分别阐述欧盟及美国在海上再保险合同领域应用这两大原则时,其哪些做法值得我国借鉴,哪些做法我国不宜吸收。“意思自治原则”中主要分析了承认默示选择和分割选择法律的可行性以及选择法律和变更选择的限制条件。阐述“最密切联系原则”时,则在明确了以特征性履行原则为主,最密切联系原则为辅,同时引入“更密切联系”作为例外条款的基础上,进一步分析了三者在海上再保险合同领域的具体适用方式。
[Abstract]:Generally speaking, the parties to the international marine reinsurance contract are insurance companies with certain professional ability, so they generally do not have a choice of law. However, due to different restrictions on choice of law, the choice of parties is not valid under the law of all countries. In addition, in temporary reinsurance, marine reinsurance contracts generally incorporate the original marine insurance contract and no longer enter into a separate choice of law clause, and different courts have different opinions as to whether such an integral incorporation includes the choice of law clause. When the court holds a negative attitude, the marine reinsurance contract will present the state of unagreed applicable law. China's marine reinsurance started late, the relevant supporting laws and regulations are not complete, and the applicable law of marine reinsurance contract is a blank in private international law. In order to solve these problems, this paper aims to study the laws and precedents of the European Union and the United States, where the private international law is more advanced and the marine reinsurance industry is more developed. This paper summarizes the characteristics and development trend of the law selection method used in dealing with similar cases for reference and reference in our country. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into three chapters: The first chapter, on the basis of introducing the meaning and nature of the international marine reinsurance contract, analyzes its relationship with the original marine insurance contract and the causes of the conflict of laws. In the second chapter, the author makes a comparative analysis of the Rome Convention and the Rome regulations I, and summarizes the development trend of the conflict of laws related to the marine reinsurance contract in the European Union. Secondly, starting with the adoption of various methods of choice of law by American courts in recent three years, this paper analyzes the new features of the methods of choice of law in the United States. The third chapter, taking "the principle of autonomy of will" and "the principle of closest connection" as the main line, and combining the national conditions of our country, expounds separately the European Union and the United States in the application of these two principles in the field of marine reinsurance contracts, which methods are worthy of our country's reference. What method our country should not absorb. The principle of autonomy of will mainly analyzes the feasibility of tacit choice and split choice law of recognition and the restriction of choice law and change choice. On the basis of defining the principle of "the closest connection", the principle of characteristic performance is the main principle, the principle of the closest connection is supplementary, and the "closer connection" is introduced as the exception clause. Further analysis of the three marine reinsurance contracts in the specific application of the way.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D997;D996.2

【参考文献】