当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 国际法论文 >

GATT“公共道德例外条款”探析

发布时间:2018-05-17 01:43

  本文选题:公共道德 + 自由贸易 ; 参考:《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》2010年01期


【摘要】:作为"公共道德例外"条款,GATT第20条第1款虽早已允许各国采取"必要的保护公共道德"的贸易限制措施,然而内涵与外延均含混不清的"公共道德概念"在这一框架内却持续了数十载之久。其后,WTO对美国赌博案的裁定为"公共道德例外条款"的发展做出了突破性的贡献,上诉机构首次对该条款作了一些阐释,但仍旧没有厘清"公共道德"的内涵和外延问题。通过围绕这些问题进行思考,研究提出公共道德概念的内涵和外延应分别朝着"国际化"和"广义的"方向谨慎地发展。
[Abstract]:As a "public morals exception" clause, although Article XX, paragraph 1, of GATT has long allowed States to adopt "necessary trade restrictions for the protection of public morals", However, the concept of public morality, which is ambiguous in connotation and extension, has lasted for decades. The WTO ruling on American gambling case has made a breakthrough contribution to the development of the "Public morality exception clause". The appellate body has explained this clause for the first time, but still has not clarified the connotation and extension of "Public morality". Through thinking around these problems, the paper puts forward that the connotation and extension of the concept of public morality should develop cautiously in the direction of "internationalization" and "broad sense" respectively.
【作者单位】: 湖南师范大学法学院;长沙理工大学文法学院;
【基金】:司法部课题“国际贸易与人权保护法律问题研究”(07SFB2048)
【分类号】:D996.1

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 苏雪芹;对人权问题的哲学思考[J];青海民族学院学报(社会科学版);1994年04期

2 唐天日;评两种不同的人权观[J];w,

本文编号:1899372


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1899372.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户3ebba***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com