《鹿特丹规则》仲裁规定之研究

发布时间：2018-05-17 03:23

本文选题：鹿特丹规则 + 汉堡规则　；参考：《中国政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：《联合国全程或者部分海上国际货物运输合同公约》(The Rotterdam Rules,简称《鹿特丹规则》)第15章允许索赔人把与承运人之间的,与运输合同相关的纠纷提交仲裁,并且对班轮运输合同、批量合同、非班轮运输分别作出了规定。但是上述仲裁规定无论在适用范围上还是具体规定上,都比任何海运公约和仲裁条约的规定要复杂,因此,笔者认为有必要探讨一下《鹿特丹规则》的仲裁规定是否对整个国际商事仲裁体系造成冲突,是否对我国的海商和仲裁界有影响和借鉴意义。而对这方面的研究国内外基本没有系统的专著,偶有零散的小篇幅的讨论,或者是在整个公约下的对该规定的提及。基于这种必要性和可行性,本文从公约的整体宏观目标和历史出发,解读具体的案文规定,结合《纽约公约》为主的国际仲裁体系,分析新规定与原有规定之间的差异和可能会出现的冲突,最后立足中国的实际分析对中国的影响和借鉴意义。本文分引言、正文和结论三部分,其中正文分四章: 第一章为公约仲裁规定的宏观介绍。本章介绍了公约的目标和内在价值,提出了仲裁规定在《鹿特丹规则》中有其重要意义。同时,介绍仲裁规定产生的历史背景,比较了《汉堡规则》与《鹿特丹规则》中的仲裁规定的异同,分析《鹿特丹规则》在仲裁部分对《汉堡规则》的继承与变化。第二章为公约仲裁规定的微观解读。本章从仲裁规定的适用范围、一般规则、批量合同例外规则、对非班轮运输的例外规定这四个方面展开对《鹿特丹规则》仲裁规定的条文分析,理清何时适用公约的仲裁规定,何种条件下适用班轮运输、批量合同及非班轮运输的规定,及如何适用的问题。第三章为公约仲裁规定存在的冲突。本章主要从国际统一仲裁的背景下分析《鹿特丹规则》在理论和操作中存在的尚未解决的问题和面临的冲突。一方面从公约的强制性、可执行性以及特殊规定等方面分析公约自身存在的问题;另一方面,从仲裁法律及其他运输公约的角度研究《鹿特丹规则》与其他国际条约的潜在冲突。特别是仲裁规定与《纽约公约》、《联合国国际商事仲裁示范法》之间的冲突。第四章为公约仲裁规定对我国法律的影响或借鉴。这章主要是简单介绍我国当事人和国家立法应该从哪些方面作准备,以抵御新公约生效可能对我国航运和贸易界的冲击。另外,也介绍了我国海事仲裁立法可以可以借鉴《鹿特丹规则》的地方。
[Abstract]:Chapter 15 of the United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea / the Rotterdam rules allows claimants to submit disputes relating to the contract of carriage between the carriers to arbitration and to the liner transport contract, Volume contract, non-liner transportation is stipulated separately. However, the above arbitration provisions are more complicated than those of any maritime convention or arbitration treaty, both in terms of their scope of application and in terms of their specific provisions. The author thinks that it is necessary to discuss whether the arbitration provisions of the Rotterdam rules will cause conflicts to the whole international commercial arbitration system, and whether they will affect and draw lessons from the maritime business and arbitration circles of our country. However, there is no systematic monographs at home and abroad, and there is occasionally a scattered discussion of this provision, or a reference to this provision under the Convention as a whole. Based on this necessity and feasibility, this paper starts from the overall macro objectives and history of the Convention, interprets the specific provisions of the text, and combines the international arbitration system dominated by the New York Convention. This paper analyzes the differences between the new regulations and the original provisions and the possible conflicts. Finally, based on China's actual analysis of the impact on China and the significance of reference. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the text is divided into four chapters: The first chapter is the macroscopic introduction of the arbitration provisions of the Convention. This chapter introduces the objective and intrinsic value of the Convention, and points out the importance of arbitration provisions in the Rotterdam rules. At the same time, this paper introduces the historical background of the arbitration regulations, compares the similarities and differences between the Hamburg rules and the Rotterdam rules, and analyzes the inheritance and changes of the Hamburg rules in the arbitration part. The second chapter is the microscopic interpretation of the arbitration provisions of the Convention. In this chapter, the scope of application of the arbitration provisions, the general rules, the exception rules for volume contracts, the exceptions to the non-liner shipping provisions, and the provisions of the Rotterdam rules on arbitration are analyzed in order to clarify when the arbitration provisions of the Convention will be applied. What conditions are applicable to liner shipping, volume contracts and non-liner shipping, and how to apply them. The third chapter is the conflict of the arbitration provisions of the Convention. In this chapter, the unsolved problems and conflicts in the theory and practice of the Rotterdam rules are analyzed under the background of international uniform arbitration. On the one hand, the problems existing in the Convention itself are analyzed in terms of its mandatory, enforceable and special provisions; on the other hand, The potential conflict between Rotterdam rules and other international treaties is studied from the angle of arbitration law and other transport conventions. In particular, the conflict between arbitration provisions and the New York Convention and the United Nations Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. The fourth chapter is the influence or reference of the arbitration provisions of the Convention on the law of our country. This chapter mainly introduces the aspects from which the parties concerned and national legislation should be prepared in order to resist the impact of the new convention on the shipping and trade circles of our country. In addition, it also introduces the place that our maritime arbitration legislation can draw lessons from the Rotterdam rules.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997.4

【相似文献】