当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 国际法论文 >

反垄断争议的可仲裁性问题研究

发布时间:2018-05-21 14:15

  本文选题:反垄断 + 争议 ; 参考:《复旦大学》2011年硕士论文


【摘要】:由于反垄断而产生的争议与市场竞争利益密切相关,更与国家管理市场、维护竞争秩序的公共政策息息相关,因此,反垄断争议不能交由仲裁解决曾是一项固定规则,曾几何时,诸多国家都否定反垄断争议的可仲裁性而将其划归为法院专属管辖的范畴。可是随着近年来各国仲裁的发展,各国法院也摒弃了此种做法,可仲裁事项呈现出了扩大化趋势。我国学者普遍认为在我国政府执行体制仍存有诸多弊端的情势下,为履行《纽约公约》规定的义务并充分利用仲裁程序所具有的优势,我国有必要将反垄断争议纳入可仲裁事项范畴。除了主管机构与实施垄断行为的经营者之间因执法行为所致的纵向型争议外,禁止垄断协议、禁止滥用市场支配地位以及禁止过度企业集中在很大程度上均是发生在平等市场主体间的横向型争议,应当具有可提交仲裁解决的本质属性。也有的学者从实践角度分析了我国《仲裁法》的相关规定,认为根据以往各国的实践,反垄断争议可以提交仲裁。 本文试图以国际商事仲裁领域内的反垄断争议的可仲裁性作为研究对象,从法律理论和商事实践的角度探讨了随着经济全球化的迅猛发展和我国仲裁制度的不断完善,反垄断争议的可仲裁性的变化及其实践中已经遇到和将要遇到的法律问题,进而分析当今世界以美国为主要代表的西方发达国家在这一方面的立法与实践发展,并反观中国现状,最后提出中国应作出的反应和对策。
[Abstract]:The disputes arising from antitrust are closely related to the interests of market competition, and are closely related to the public policies of the state to manage the market and maintain the competition order. Therefore, it was once a fixed rule that the antitrust disputes could not be resolved by arbitration. Once upon a time, many countries denied the arbitrability of antitrust disputes and classified them as the exclusive jurisdiction of the court. However, with the development of arbitration in recent years, the courts of various countries have abandoned this practice, and the subject matter of arbitration has shown a trend of expansion. Chinese scholars generally believe that in order to fulfill the obligations under the New York Convention and make full use of the advantages of arbitration procedures, there are still many drawbacks in the enforcement system of our government. It is necessary for China to bring antitrust disputes into the category of arbitrable matters. Except for the vertical disputes between the competent authority and the operator who carries out the monopoly act as a result of the enforcement of the law, the monopoly agreement shall be prohibited, The prohibition of abuse of dominant market position and the prohibition of excessive concentration of enterprises are horizontal disputes occurring among the subjects of equal market to a great extent and should have the essential attribute that can be submitted to arbitration for settlement. Some scholars have analyzed the relevant provisions of our country's Arbitration Law from the point of view of practice, and think that according to the practice of other countries, antitrust disputes can be submitted to arbitration. This paper attempts to take the arbitrability of antitrust disputes in the field of international commercial arbitration as the object of study. From the angle of legal theory and commercial practice, this paper probes into the rapid development of economic globalization and the continuous improvement of arbitration system in China. The arbitrability of antitrust disputes and the legal problems that have been met and will be encountered in practice, and then analyzes the development of legislation and practice in this area in the western developed countries, which are mainly represented by the United States in today's world. In the end, the author puts forward some countermeasures and responses to the situation of China.
【学位授予单位】:复旦大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D996.1;D922.294;D925.7

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前4条

1 张艾清;国际商事仲裁的可仲裁性问题研究[J];贵州民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年06期

2 王健;;反垄断法私人执行制度初探[J];法商研究;2007年02期

3 唐蕴锋;争议事项可仲裁性浅析[J];南京经济学院学报;2001年04期

4 胡玉鸿;法律争议论[J];法治论丛;2002年05期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 周昀;反垄断法论[D];中国政法大学;2001年



本文编号:1919520

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1919520.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户3221d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com