中国—东盟自由贸易区争端解决机制存在的问题及完善对策

发布时间：2018-05-22 18:30

本文选题：中国——东盟自由贸易区 + 争端解决机制　；参考：《云南大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：建立中国——东盟自由贸易区的共同设想的提出是在2000年11月于新加坡召开的中国与东盟领导人会议期间。2002年11月4日,总理朱隆基代表中国与东盟各国领导人一同签署了《中国——东盟全面经济合作框架协议》(以下简称《框架协议》)。《中国——东盟全面经济合作框架协议》的正式签署标志着中国与东盟各国的经济、贸易的合作进入到一个崭新的阶段,中国和东盟之间的经济、贸易合作关系实现了真正跨越式的发展。随后中国与东盟自由贸易区又签订了中国——东盟自由贸易区《争端解决机制协议》(以下简称CAFTA《争端解决机制协议》)。CAFTA《争端解决机制协议》的签定一定程度上为中国——东盟自由贸易区各项贸易措施的实施提供有力法律保障,为中国与东盟各成员国在法律框架下进一步拓展经济贸易的合作奠定了基础。但该协议仍有诸多不足之处,并且该协议自签署至今仍未真正发挥作用。本文主要以中国与东盟各国在CAFTA《争端解决机制协议》中达成的共识为基础,通过阐述CAFTA争端解决机制的特点,比较和借鉴世贸组织关于争议解决机制的相关规定,结合国际投资争端解决机制的发展趋势,分析CAFTA《争端解决机制协议》存在的问题,提出完善的建议。本文共分四个部分。第一部分对CAFTA《争端解决机制协议》的概述,主要介绍了CAFTA《争端解决机制协议》的产生背景、意义、特点,包括相关机构的设立、程序安排和执行方式。第二部分对CAFTA《争端解决机制协议》的规则和内容与WTO争端解决机制相关内容进行比较,主要针对两者之间关于争端解决机制的基本程序、适用范围与主体、工作时限和争端解决机构及争端解决机制的评价等方面的异同。第三部分分析CAFTA《争端解决机制协议》存在的问题以及现实缺陷。第四部分对如何完善CAFTA《争端解决机制协议》提出具体建议,如中国——东盟自由贸易区法制建设,以及CAFTA《争端解决机制协议》中有关于常设争端解决机构的设立,仲裁程序中仲裁机构的设置、仲裁人员的选人、仲裁裁决的复核和执行中可能存在的问题提出完善建议。
[Abstract]:The joint vision for the establishment of a China-ASEAN Free Trade area was put forward during the China-ASEAN leaders' meeting held in Singapore in November 2000. On 4 November 2002, On behalf of China and ASEAN leaders, Premier Zhu Longji signed the Framework Agreement on China-ASEAN Comprehensive Economic Cooperation (hereinafter referred to as the Framework Agreement). The signing marks the economies of China and the ASEAN countries. Trade cooperation has entered a new stage. The economic and trade cooperation between China and ASEAN has realized a real leapfrog development. Subsequently, the China-ASEAN Free Trade area signed the Agreement on dispute settlement Mechanism between China and ASEAN Free Trade area (hereinafter referred to as the CAFTA Agreement on dispute settlement Mechanism). The implementation of various trade measures in the China-ASEAN Free Trade area provides a strong legal guarantee, It has laid a foundation for the further development of economic and trade cooperation between China and ASEAN member countries under the legal framework. However, the agreement still has many shortcomings, and it has not really played a role since it was signed. Based on the consensus reached between China and ASEAN countries in the CAFTA dispute settlement Mechanism Agreement, this paper compares and draws lessons from the relevant provisions of the CAFTA dispute settlement Mechanism by elaborating the characteristics of the CAFTA dispute settlement Mechanism. Combined with the development trend of the international investment dispute settlement mechanism, this paper analyzes the problems existing in the Agreement on the dispute settlement Mechanism of CAFTA, and puts forward some suggestions for perfection. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part is an overview of the CAFTA Agreement on dispute settlement Mechanism, which mainly introduces the background, significance and characteristics of the CAFTA Agreement on dispute settlement Mechanism, including the establishment of relevant institutions, procedural arrangements and implementation methods. The second part compares the rules and contents of the CAFTA dispute settlement Mechanism Agreement with the relevant contents of the WTO dispute settlement Mechanism, mainly aiming at the basic procedure, application scope and subject of the dispute settlement Mechanism between the two parties. The differences and similarities between the time limit of work and the evaluation of dispute settlement body and dispute settlement mechanism. The third part analyzes the existing problems and practical defects of CAFTA dispute settlement Mechanism Agreement. The fourth part puts forward concrete suggestions on how to perfect the Agreement on dispute settlement Mechanism of CAFTA, such as the legal construction of China-ASEAN Free Trade area, and the establishment of permanent dispute settlement body in the Agreement on dispute settlement Mechanism of CAFTA. The establishment of the arbitration institution, the selection of the arbiter, the review of the arbitration award and the possible problems existing in the execution of the arbitration award are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：云南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.1

【参考文献】