中国缔结的双边条约在特别行政区的适用问题——兼评“世能诉老挝案”上诉判决

发布时间：2018-05-26 19:11

本文选题：世能诉老挝案 + 国际条约　；参考：《环球法律评论》2017年05期

【摘要】：中国根据"一国两制"基本方针对中国缔结的双边条约适用于特别行政区的制度做了特殊安排。这一切合港澳实际的精巧设计在总体运行平稳的同时也遭遇了实践挑战。在"世能诉老挝案"中,新加坡最高法院上诉庭判定,《中国—老挝双边投资保护协定》适用于澳门特别行政区。这一判决与中国对国际条约适用于特别行政区的制度预期相悖。该判决在适用"条约边界移动"、"关键日期"、解释条约的"嗣后协定"等国际法规则和概念时存在明显错误,多处推理论证也因违反逻辑而不具说服力。但该案所折射出的关于国际条约适用于特别行政区的制度安排对第三方的效力问题不容回避,中国有必要尽快采取措施解决这一问题。
[Abstract]:China has made special arrangements in accordance with the basic principle of "one country, two systems" for the application of bilateral treaties concluded by China to the Special Administrative region. All this Hong Kong and Macao practical design in the overall smooth operation but also encountered practical challenges. In the case of WHO v. Laos, the Appeals Division of the Supreme Court of Singapore held that the China-Laos bilateral Investment Protection Agreement was applicable to the Macao Special Administrative region. The ruling contradicts China's expectations that international treaties apply to the Special Administrative region. There are obvious errors in the application of the rules and concepts of international law, such as "moving of treaty boundary", "critical date", interpretation of "subsequent agreement" of the treaty, and many reasoning arguments are not convincing because of illogic. However, this case reflects the question of the effectiveness of the system of international treaties applicable to special administrative regions against third parties, and it is necessary for China to take measures to solve this problem as soon as possible.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院国际法研究所;
【基金】：2014年度国家社会科学基金项目“国际条约在中国法律体系中的地位分析与制度设计研究”(14BFX186)的研究成果
【分类号】：D996.4

【相似文献】